RightHandOfIkaros @ RightHandOfIkaros @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

2,420

Joined

2 yr. ago

As an avid pre-Disney SW fan myself, fans weren't that pissed at 7. Outside of it being ANH again very safe and Rey being too good at everything from the get-go with absolutely no character development to support that, 7 was met with mostly lukewarm reception. Not awful, but not great either. It played it safe and everyone could tell.

Then Rian entered the picture. The individual that is documented on video saying he wanted to make a movie that at least half of viewers hated. Well, mission accomplished, buddy.

Tied up every loose end from 7 and tied up its own loose ends leaving absolutely no meaningful questions for 9. Not to mention half the movie could have been deleted with no consequence (seriously, what on earth was going on with the Canto arc?), multiple character assassinations, killed off a character with lots of potential to be a decent BBEG in the most unceremonious way ever, and introduced a major canon-breaking scene.

I feel bad for JJ on 9 honestly. How do you even follow up on 8? 7 was such a soft-ball lay-up for anyone to write a sequel to, and Disney thought the best guy for the job was Mr. I Want To Make A Movie That Passionate Fans Hate? Its almost like Rian was spiteful and wrote 8 to be bad on purpose because he didn't like that Abrams had written 7. Why they did not have JJ just write the whole trilogy is beyond me. Would definitely have been better than what we got, at least it would have been more coherent. At the very least, mid is better than awful. Maybe Rose Tico could have been a real character with actual development and purpose instead of a useless character with an entirely unnecessary death.

The prequels are only viewed better now because 7, 8, and 9 proved something could be worse. As Qui-Gon Jinn said, "There is always a bigger fish."

Can I summon them for harrassing me?

This kind of mentality is how most modern sequels of old properties have failed, BTW.

Majority of the audience are the people that would say "The G Man wouldn't do that in my day." That kind of thinking helps continuity as well.

Otherwise you end up with spectacular failures like Star Wars Episodes 8 and 9.

Seems like SAG could try to make the same argument if Epic had hired a non-SAG voice actor.

Yes, or perhaps he gave his permission just to use his voice since he recorded more dialogue lines but maybe voice AI wasn't advanced enough at that time. His estate did give permission with regards AI though, IIRC.

Honestly? Let James Earl Jones keep Vader. He can keep living as Darth instead of fading away into obscurity. He earned it.

China is even bigger, though. There are many cases where the same happened, a product was altered globally because the company selling it wanted all that sweet China money and maintaining two different versions would be too costly.

Its just strange to me China wouldn't have a problem with this, but the EU does? The CCP is way more restrictive and controlling than the EU. If the CCP found out that single player games are connecting to an outside internet source, they'd shut that down immediately. They would be freaking out. Perhaps it is because PC gaming in China is not very popular compared to mobile? Or perhaps because it is so expensive due to taxes and other restrictions that they don't feel like they need to bother? I wonder.

I realize it is likely you are from a nation in the European Union, as Europeans and Canadians seem to make up like 95% of Lemmy's userbase, so I mean no offense when I say this, but the Chinese gamer playerbase is more than double the size of the playerbases of every nation in the entire EU combined. Companies wouldn't really care about losing EU if they can break into or keep the Chinese market. For many of the previous documented cases of EU legislation changing something, the businesses would have totally ignored those if China required something different and the business had to choose between the two. Bigger number means more money.

Im just saying it is shocking to me that the CCP seems to be okay with that. I don't think the CCP makes basically any right choices, but even a broken clock is right twice a day, and this would be one of those times. Crazy they haven't done anything about it already. The EU shouldn't need to handle this if the CCP knew about it. Maybe they don't know?

Sounds like literally every other mobile game when they reach End of Service to me. No time given on when servers will shut down until a month in advance, no refunds, etc.

It may be large but EU is certainly not the largest.

This is something I think even the Chinese government would want to ban.

Its attached to the name because:

1. No creatives at Bungie can come up with an original idea apparently
2. Bungie believes the name alone will carry it (it wont)

And then they made Myth II, which they had to recall (that almost bankrupted their company) because trying to uninstall it could delete your system folder and brick your PC.

At least with Myth II, Bungie actually made the right call and did the right thing.

Are they adding a PSN Account requirement to a single player game again?

Should be illegal. It's not, but it should be. Globally.

But it doesnt let me play with 4 other players, and thats honestly a huge L. Teams of 5 only have the pption of highly competitive games like shooters and MOBAs. Thats it. It would be nice to have other options for once.

The implication that generative AI would spit out pixel-for-pixel copies from its training data is flat out wrong. Even generative AI would have made more original assets than what Bungie put in Marathon. The worst part is that this is like the 4th time they've been caught doing this.

Being inspired by an art style and using that style is fine, and completely normal. Thats how art works. But copying and pasting 1 for 1 is not fine.

Is it only the management though? You mean to tell me absolutely none of the artists knew about this, or that literally ONLY ONE "ex-employee" artist knew this was going on among the art team? Do Bungie only have one artist making art assets for textures across various objects, as well as assets they use on their website and in their trailers?

"Ex-employee" is a scapegoat, but I guarantee you there was more than one artist, entirely unrelated to management, that knew this was going on and will happily blame the scapegoat to absolve themselves of their involvement.

Rule 1 of Lemmy: Worship Linux, or be subjected to poor treatment, unfortunately.

Sailing is back on the menu once Empress decides, I guess? Is Empress still the only one cracking Denuvo, or has the Denuvo Cracking scene changed much in the last 5-10 years? I don't really keep up with it much.

"Thin your paints"

I also have an old account with ~$6,000 USD on it. I don't worry about it so much. Also, I don't think it includes when a game was purchased on sale, because on my account I have one of the Star Wars mega bundles that came with like 20 classic Star Wars games, but it says it was like $220 or something. I absolutely bought it when it was on sale, and not when it was full priced, because that money would fund Disney and I don't want to fund Disney any more than I feel is absolutely necessary. So some of the prices may not be reliable with what was actually spent. (After manually adding up the purchase, I only spent ~$59 USD on the bundle which I bought in 2018).

By comparison, I have put ~$10,000 USD into my car, with $7,000 on the engine alone. So seeing the $6,000 might have been scary initially, but given the value of the dollar, I am kinda surprised the number wasn't bigger.

Also, my account is old enough that it doesn't include anything from before 2016? or some year like that.

I am American citizen, therefore I imagine it would either be illegal or extremely damaging to their cause if I signed for one that is designated for European government.

I will join ones here in the States though.

Wait, you don't know about Mario's other brother, MAIIIO?