RightHandOfIkaros @ RightHandOfIkaros @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

2,431

Joined

2 yr. ago

A bigger difference IMO was that Star Trek attempted to make commentary on real world social issues, whereas Star Wars did not. Star Wars was a fantasy story about good versus evil, it did not try to comment on the real world. Well, pre~2012 mostly, anyways.

Star Trek, I mean the old good Star Trek from pre~2012 and not its most modern iterations, could logically present an episode that was very obviously about X or Y real world social issue. So far, same as modern Star Trek so why do I differentiate them? Well, old Star Trek did not feel compelled to tell its viewers the "correct" answer, or how to think. The episode would present the viewer with an issue, and then it would usually spend time explaining both sides of the issue. Then, the crew of the Enterprise would make their choice, and explain why they chose that answer. It was not about "this is the correct answer," it was mostly about getting the viewer simply to think. To use their brain. Form their own opinion just like the Enterprise crew did. If someone disagreed with what the Enterprise crew chose, they did not feel like the show writers were calling them unsavory names. The viewer simply felt like they didn't agree with the Enterprise crews choice, but that did not make them stop watching the show because they felt insulted. They would tune in next week to see what happened next.

This is where I think modern Star Trek goes wrong. The last two or three episodes I tried to watch featured character assassination, bad writing in general, lore inaccuracies, but also it tried to tell the viewer how to think, or what the correct answer was, at the same time insulting the viewer if they chose any other answer than whatever was decided in the show. The only one that I didn't get this feeling from and actually still liked a bit was the Lower Decks animated comedy.

I mean, some people will agree and others will disagree because ultimately the two series are quite different from each other.

Star Trek is for the people that like hard science fiction. They want the technical explanation why something happens or how it works.

Star Wars is for the people that don't really care about hard science fiction. There might be a scentific explanation for something or there might not be. The people that like Star Wars aren't really going to care if it isn't explained.

As for me, I like both for different reasons. Though I don't really like either series after ~2012.

"Its not OUR fault, its THEIR fault."

Sure Execubro... Sure...

Not a good sign.

If this documentary doesn't require the LEGO Island Documentary CD to be in the CD-ROM drive, then it is fake.

Command and Conquer Generals: Zero Hour.

I mean, obviously play the Red Alert games too. But Generals: Zero Hour was BIG fun in the day. A bit hard to get it to play nice with modern computers, but it was recently added to Steam so its at least legally acquirable again.

Age of Empires 2, obviously. Still the GOAT of Age. Its latest released still gets updates, which is great.

IDK about it being a "must play," but I actually quite enjoyed the strategic/tactical RPG Tuned Hearts, for the Japanese PC98 series of home computers. Im not much of a fan of turn based games in general, but something about Tuned Hearts kept me playing. IDK if it was the battle art or the hilarious enemy characters, but either way I enjoyed my time with the game.

The PSP had Joan De'Arc, which I think is based on an anime, but I could be wrong. It plays similar to Final Fantasy Tactics or Fire Emblem, I think. Not a bad little game.

For 4X, I like playing Stellaris. Granted, every time I play my saves get massively bloated and end game lag is unbearable sometimes due to fleet sizes, and the developers update the game so often that either my save breaks or the systems are vastly different from whenever I played last, but aside from that the game is a lot of fun. If a real time 4X strategy space civilization game sounds interesting to you, I'd give it a shot. Otherwise for turn-based, Galactic Civilizations III from Stardock was my go-to.

That's pretty bad for something as big as Dragon Age.

My hope: a cool new Ecco game like the final entry in the series.

Reality: Gambling simulator using environment conscious dolphins as a mascot.

Well no sex crime was kinda obvious. But just because its not a sex crime doesn't mean its not a violent crime. Obviously not murder because 3 years for a murder would be crazy, but I was originally assuming some kind of physical assault or battery (possibly domestic violence), or something like serious injury while committing a crime / brandishing or discharging a weapon while committing a crime, such as armed robbery where someone got hurt.

It is strange that they claim to be a different person but they never turned themselves in or plead guilty or anything I guess? Like, I feel like a person who has decided to change would get that cleared up expeditiously, probably courts might be more lenient with the sentencing in that case.

"It isn't anyone's business," but I mean, they are talking about it more. And there is a media outlet (admittedly Kotaku, lol) making an article about it. If it was a crime committed in the USA, thats public information, as is the court proceeding so if anyone knew them or wanted to know, they could legally get that information regardless. Seems like the developer should just not say anything and/or contact a lawyer for a public statement about it.

People are going to be curious. People are going to speculate. Thats how people work. Its going to come out at some point, there is no reason to try to obscure it now. If they really are different then they go in, serve their time, probably get out early on good behaviour, and everything goes back to the way it was more or less. Can't change what happened now.

I did, and I really liked it. I am excited to see how the sequel holds up, the trailer was so whacky I couldn't look away.

They seem to allude to a violent crime, as they said they "were a different more violent person in the past."

Nintendos lawyer cannot legally clarify anything. A judge has to do that.

Switching to Linux is literally free. It costs way more to get a license key for Windows than it does to just download Linux. People stick with what they know, and what they know is Windows is for PC, OSX is for Apple, and they may or may not even know anything about Linux at all. I would even go so far as to say most people would run Android for an OS instead of a traditional Linux distro.

Of course Windows is fine. Its the largest and most used gaming PC operating system. It couldn't ever reach that status if it was as bad as Lemmy users make it seem. Valve could care less what you play on as long as they can sell you games to play on it. Which is great, I think more game publishers/distributors should be this way.

Competition is always great. To be fair, Windows wasn't really designed with a handheld game console in mind as its target distribution platform. SteamOS, at least its current version, was designed for that exact purpose. Would definitely welcome a more lightweight Windows to come from this though, not just for handhelds but just regular desktops too.

It is hilarious to me that Lemmy users, who seem to mostly be obsessed with Linux (borderline Arch users except slightly less annoying about it), talk like Windows is such a massively hated OS when it is literally still the most widely distributed and used OS in the world. Like yes, so many people globally hate Windows which is why everyone keeps using Windows and not switching to something they hate less. Of course.

It will end up just like the RE2 Remake and Silent Hill 2 Remake. The new people who never played the original will love it, but fans of the original will either hate it or be mixed on it. But publishers literally do not care about existing customers, so they won't care what existing fans have to say on it as long as the new people buy it. Reviewers will overrate the remakes because the original was so highly regarded. Same story as most remakes, really.

NetEase doesnt care, but probably as long as it makes money Disney won't care either. Theyre not doing so well financially for Disney lately. The only reason theyre stopping this is because they can't sell skins, not because of who the modded skins are of.

The funny AI presidents playing games together videos that unfortunately died off lately. Wish we could all get along like that.

Everything on Reddit is fake.

Thank you