Skip Navigation

Posts
8
Comments
361
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I feel I was misconstrued. 1. a law will probably happen, and 2. it will do fuck all because the tool chain and posting/sharing process are going to be completely anonymous.

    Yeah, in specific cases where you can determine deepfake revenge porn of Person A was posted by Person B who had an axe to grind, you might get a prosecution. I just don't think the dudes making porn on their Nvidia GPUs of Gal Godot fckin Boba Fett are ever gonna get caught, and the celebrity cat will stay forever out of the bag.

  • But, the guy admits that what they were doing with the domains was expressly permitted in the "Enterprise" class service. If it was expressly prohibited in the "Business" class service, then they set themselves up for the shakedown.

  • First of all, congrats! Your business must have become pretty successful. How exactly did CF decide to “ask” you to switch to Enterprise?

    Maybe...

    You violated their terms of service...

    I wouldn't say Cloudflare is innocent, here, but this business handled Cloudflare the cudgel that was used to beat them. They admit to doing something with their domains that was expressly prohibited in the service they were paying for.

  • I suppose the only thing I disagree with is that the law can do anything about it. Obviously, you can go after sites that have money and/or a real business presence, a la Pornhub. But the rest? It's the wild west.

  • Corn chips are no place for a mighty warrior

  • (whispers) … Harambe …

  • It must be Thursday

  • we need a great culling

    Are you calling for slaughter?

  • It's exactly the same as their regular accents except every third sentence is, "Jesus Tapdancing Christ it is fucking cold in here, somebody turn up the heat!"

  • I've been using Ubuntu for years and I literally had no idea. Admittedly, I don't deal with servers or anything, so I guess some of the stuff coming from their package respositories could be "snap" format and I wouldn't really notice.

  • What the hell is a snap?

  • Slackware circa 1996

  • Fundamentally, it's the same issue that affected the Stanford Prison Experiment & the Milgram experiment. You can't claim that the subjects naturally developed certain behaviors, if they were being prompted or saw through the prompts.

    Since Sherif proved himself to be untrustworthy after the first experiment failed to provide the results he was looking for, we can't really trust that any of the conditions of the conflict between the campers arose from the campers themselves.

  • Robbers Cave has been debunked. Short version:

    Muzafer Sherif's first experiment ("Middle Grove") failed when the two groups worked together to figure out that they were being manipulated. The second experiment ("Robbers Cave") was only apparently successful because the "camp counselors" were explicitly aiding and abetting the feud between the two groups.

    Of course, Sherif didn't mention these details when he publicized his results.

  • Yes, the article mentions it. Ms. Monteleone did not (at least, among items attributed to Ms. Monteleone).

    The article is not speaking for Bumble. Ms. Monteleone IS speaking for Bumble.

  • The song is from the perspective of the company, not the consumer.

  • You labor under the impression that they would only track & keep data if the user was logged in.

    Who changed the username in the on-board OnStar system? Did you think to perform a full factory reset on the car's electronic systems, before selling the car? CAN you?