I guess it will take time to do a proper investigation of the materials like the blades to see if there was a failure there, and where. Someone by now has seen something though and has a theory, they just can't talk yet. There was low fuel mentioned, but running out of fuel doesn't separate rotors from the hub.
I will give it to you, when it works, it does some magical stuff. But try designing such complex things that are miracles in coding and then it have to run on a half-ass computer. I want to say terminal, it's not that, but it's those small fake computers that companies seem to think are better to get than an actual desktop because they're cheap. I know that's hardware, not Excel, but Excel does not run well on that, so...
Or worse, you get moved to 365 which doesn't do most scripting and breaks all that was working. That cloud shit is a problem.
You didn't factor in the variability of federation vs. a single platform and how not only can it affect how long it takes for everyone to see a post, if they do at all, but also how many duplications there may be floating around. And I don't know if you can predict that reliably, as we're all still trying to figure it out.
Yes, and for generally anything this is a good idea. From fire drills to bad weather plans (mass shootings in the US, yay), know what to do and where to go. It's just a bit surreal that we're now having to talk about doing the same thing for government suppression acts and civil disturbance. But it's here, apparently.
No, it's hard to train yourself for the unknown. I'm great in a crisis at work since I know things and have experience, and it's actually where I've seen it in action. Coworkers without that expertise standing wondering what to do, they just need a direction and things get done. But could I do the same in a medical situation or a disaster, or in this case a political upheaval? I like to think so, but I don't know.
It might be because people don't do well in a crisis and tend to seek out the normal. Like grabbing your luggage in a burning plane, or standing around in a medical situation. How to fix this? The immediate one is to have someone take charge and give instruction to others. For example in the medical example, you don't ask for help, you point at people and give them a duty, like calling 9-1-1 or getting something to help the victim. They'll do it, they just needed direction because their brain is stuck.
More importantly in this case, we need resistance and protesting to become a normal thing that people see and are exposed to. Then when they get into a situation where a reaction is needed, they'll have something to fall back on what to do and how to act. For most people they're still stuck in the "get back to normal" mode and hoping that things will get better if they just wait it out.
I remember as a kid sitting in front of the TV and watching the live broadcast of the first test flight. For it to also be named after a scifi show I loved was icing on the cake. I would have been okay with the original name planned, Constitution, as Enterprise is technically Constitution-class, and that name has some awesome lore behind it too.
Not meaning to imply anything to OP's abilities, but part of the effectiveness of any communication is the delivery. Some people don't get satire or other implied meanings even in person. Text is harder to do unless the reader is familiar with references or is in the same "mode" of humor at the time. Sometimes to make a joke or twist work online means you have to put a bit more background or setup than you would in other settings. I've done the same, where I just type out a phrase or quote or line as I would IRL, and then realize that it's not that funny without a bit of context added to help it.
Note an example is the very first part I added so OP didn't think I was saying they were bad at satire. In real conversation I might not have to say that because it's implied we're talking about generalities and not them. Or adding /s to a joke that could be taken serious, or other emotes to create a setting for the punchline.
I think (and this is just my opinion based on years of seeing online discussions) that people are quick to type in their thoughts and hit send without reading over and editing things for clarify. That leads to misunderstandings which fuels the typical arguments we find all because of missing nuances. Hell, I've even read over things, submitted a post, and then gone right back to edit because I saw something else needed.
Supporting people like Crockett who are not quietly letting this go. After all, it is their job as a representative to represent those of us who give a shit.
She's doing her job. She's one representative out of a huge number, most who are supporting Trump, so she's being vocal about it. What else do you want her to do? What are you doing?
Maybe the orange color happened to coincide with the patterns that worked best. Had their prey been able to see the orange tint it would have worked against the tiger, but since they can't it was allowed to flourish with that pattern. If true at all, it's a bit of a dead end since a mutation for the prey to begin seeing orange means tigers have narrowed into that pattern dependent on the color.
Just have to add that from a distance they had noticed lights coming off and on and what seemed to be figures in the windows, but when they got a closer look it was totally empty.
I haven't seen the sequel to it yet, and sort of was fine leaving it open-ended. I can see how there are dark parts to that episode, mainly from sticking with Dark Mirror's premise that tech can be used badly. It also paints a not-so-great picture of the real people, hero worship, maybe the gaming industry? The sim copies seem to make out the best of anyone. Definitely a favorite, if I'd rate it on dark vs. positive, it's 8/10 positive, whereas San Junipero was a 10/10 in the end. Actually San was a 9/10, as it did show that some used the tech there as escape and didn't grow like the main characters finally did.
Rhaedas @ Rhaedas @fedia.io Posts 1Comments 1,810Joined 1 yr. ago
When you find yourself on the other side from Big Bird, Mr. Rogers, and Captain America, you need to do some serious reevaluation.