Popular Science had an "open source" robot lawnmower plans in the...80s? I have it somewhere. Old enough that it used deep cycle lead-acid batteries and spinning round dremel blades. No laser to cut the grass, although it did use LEDs for sensors for grass height.
I have cats, and two Eufys, one for each floor. I don't run them every day since the cats are all shorthair and it takes a bit to add up, but it's nice to just let it go for a bit and check in.
And do that. Don't assume the vacuum is strong enough to suck things all the way in. They can easily be clogged the first run through and then you're just pushing crap around. Should carry the lesson over to any automation. Trust to a certain level, but know what it can and cannot do and when to step in.
This would mean any liquid in plastic is a large source. Bottled water has other options, not so much the rest. I mean they could have different packaging and some do, but cost is a reason plastic is primarily used.
Isolation or minimal contact is not only another option, it always has been the first option to consider. It's difficult to do in our society, so we have other things like masking and distancing, but a virus can't spread to/from you if you're not around other persons.
Made the mistake of thinking I could spray one of the big Florida ones, coming from a place where I was used to the German cockroach. He did not die. He was however very pissed and tried to get me through the door I managed to shut in time.
Moonlet looks to be a term specific for ring-embedded moons (just Ring A?), based on wikipedia for the word and a link from there on a list of them. I don't think these are even included in the list of main moons, but rather are perhaps larger masses of the ring itself that are serving as structure creators with their gravity influence (like the bigger shepherd moons on the edges).
It won't leave, just slow to a much farther orbit, so that's why I said future projection, or best we can do. Many of these moons seem to be in erratic and retrograde paths, something that can't last even a "short" time, as you'd expect of remnants of breakups or of captured objects.
Unlike the planet/dwarf planet designation, it seems that a moon is a moon no matter its characteristics. That makes a debris field like Saturn quite interesting. Should there be a limit to what a moon is? Based on how number increases as size decreases, there are certainly far more we can't easily detect from Earth.
My thought is projection of orbit stability, which ignores the size but goes directly for whether or not it's a temporary part of the planet's system.
First, no one knows if the picture is someone connected or a stolen cam footage to use. So we don't know any identity. Could be automated or could be individually sent out. More important is the question of restrictions of postings in some way. How would one do this before the first attempts by each new user profile? When they first started there were a few other names used, but for whatever reason (ease or maybe enjoying the attention now) Nicole has become the one seen, through various instances that would each have to set up their own ban.
As for what the point is, that could be asked of so many phishing and spam attempts. Often times they're so bad that even if you wanted to, the links are incomplete or don't make sense. Spam calls can be the same way. Usually letting them go to voicemail gets them to hang up before anything is left, but I've heard some live and recorded where it doesn't even get through the spiel. What was the point? Maybe to establish a connection...or maybe just badly planned implementation.
Anyway, no one knows yet about Nicole, and honestly if it wasn't just the single name and picture/info, it would all just be part of the constant spam that's out there. Perhaps "they" hit on a formula to retain recognition, but now just don't know what to do with it.
There are people in positions of power who have the ability to ask this question and start the process. That they still don't suggests a lot more than just one crazy individual leading the madness.
Painful would be the several (!) times I had to check the computer over after they fell for a tech help scam and lost money. The stupid thing was that if someone tried to sell them something on the street or phone they were smart enough to refuse, but for some reason a popup on the computer makes things legit. Even after it was a scam the last time it happened. Why?
There are many more lesser events that aren't painful as much as just tedious, but I think having some patience and knowing what to tell them (vs. actually explaining it) helped. I tried to reduce the complexity and lock things down, but in the end it was just easier to come over and fix the problem every now and then.
He's really helping things along with all these acts of stability, consistency, and predictability. Stuff businesses thrive on. Maybe the business world outside of the stock market (which the manipulation of is what this may all be about anyway) is just ignoring the day to day until something persists long enough to even get into the daily supply chain.
Banks may come to them, but hardly knocking with demands. 'If you owe the bank $100, that's your problem. If you owe the bank $100 million, that's the bank's problem.' And how they interact with banks, loans, etc. is far different in scale and method than the average consumer anyway.
Looks like just posts from Lemmy instances. Now, are replies posts? I don't think so, I think it's original topics. But many replies from Lemmy users are going to be to outside sources, so there's a lot going on!
Using it to share data can be a nightmare, especially since different departments might look at that data in various ways and want their own formats. I work for a Fortune 500 company that, at least at my level of management, emailing around attached full spreadsheets of daily data rather than have a centralized database. I've fought it for years, but it's what the higher ups want...stupid.
Even better when Microsoft puts out improvements like 365 and OneDrive that break certain functions, then depreciates Excel itself. God I hate the cloud.
Rhaedas @ Rhaedas @fedia.io Posts 1Comments 1,816Joined 1 yr. ago
Popular Science had an "open source" robot lawnmower plans in the...80s? I have it somewhere. Old enough that it used deep cycle lead-acid batteries and spinning round dremel blades. No laser to cut the grass, although it did use LEDs for sensors for grass height.