I think you should watch this video. The orgional paper linking vaccines to autism was specifically made to further the authors ambition. He lied and withheld or manipulated data in order to support his work.
Drug companies go through extensive trials before bringing vaccines to the market. So who do you believe? Extensive peer reviewed studies or one guy clearly furthering his own agenda?
The defense argument is that there was no sex, so the payments to Michael Cohen were not hush money but legal feels and Cohen acted independently. So arguing there was no sex supports their defense.
It's not like they are advertising specific mine placement. They showed pictures about trenches, anti-vehicles barriers, gates, etc. This stuff isn't hidden, a guy with a camera at the border could spot everything, let alone aerial or satellite imagery. It's about hardening the border and slowing down invaders. Then you layer it with more complex defense systems to support the static defense.
Just create another social media platform and only give the wealthy access so the poor don't feel bad. Call it like Yacht Club or Gaited Community or something.
Oh boy do I have news. God agreed with you and in 2010 "Touchdown Jesus" was struck by lightning and burned down. They replaced it with a more traditional version. Personally I liked the orgional more.
Did the tree get weirdly wider at the hand section or was it carved from a seperate tree and placed on the stump? The hand is much wider than the narrower trunk.
The justification people use is that allowing them to profit through "normal/legal" channels prevents them from taking bribes or seeking other forms of income.
Absolutely disgusting and boils down to the same thing. Very effective at preventing corruption too (/s). A normal person would be jailed.
Mine doesn't sound like anything but I can change the cadence or accent. Like it doesn't make the "noise" as hearing. Like it bypasses those "channels".
There was a post/meme asking women if they would prefer to be alone in a forest with a bear or male stranger. Idk if a real poll or what, but I have seen it saying most women prefer the bear. People came out of the woodwork talking about how dangerous bears are and asking why are they afraid of strange men to the point they started proving why women would would pick the bear.
I had no idea it didn't turn everyone invisible! The intention/desire makes so much sense. I always though Sauron's flesh was invisible but it didn't hid the armor. Thanks for the explanation.
Trump's lawyers are trying to delay his other trials. Create BS arguments that require a ruling before his other trials can proceed, elevate it to Supreme Court, run out the clock, hope he gets elected before other cases find him guilty.
But Uncle Ruckus is white and has a skin problem. This is more like Stephen from Django unchained, which is even crazier.
Edit: Reworded