Permanently Deleted
Resonosity @ Resonosity @lemmy.dbzer0.com Posts 2Comments 235Joined 12 mo. ago
Resonosity @ Resonosity @lemmy.dbzer0.com
Posts
2
Comments
235
Joined
12 mo. ago
Deleted
Permanently Deleted
Jump
I understand where you're coming from, but you're not offering any solutions. Makes you look like a troll that acts in bad faith.
If you care enough to want people to listen to you, perhaps change your approach.
Deleted
Permanently Deleted
Jump
He rolled over and let the DNC fuck him
How so?
Deleted
Permanently Deleted
Jump
Skateparkge
I'll go ahead and recommend HappyCow for anyone looking for plant-based options outside of their home community.
They have a map where people can suggest places that have vegetarian or vegan options but are mostly omnivorous, or full on vegetarian or vegan restaurants, cafes, grocery stores, food trucks, you name it. I think HappyCow the company also verifies the places people upload so it's somewhat vetted.
I find that starting with HappyCow and then cross-referencing with Google Maps or OSM gives me the best results.
Forager Project has a nice oatmilk. I like it better than Oatly.
T-Mobile supports these bands:
- 5G: n2/41/71/258/260/261
- 5G,ER: n25
- 4GLTE: B4/5/12/71
- 4GLTE,ER: B25/66
- 2G,GSM: B2
Fairphone 5 supports these bands:
- 5G: n1/2/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/41/48/71/77/78
- 5G,ER: n66
- 4GLTE: B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/20/28/32/38/40/41/42/48/71
- 4GLTE,ER: B66
It looks like the Fairphone 5 covers T-Mobile's 5G Frequency Band 1 frequencies (bold), but Frequency Band 2 is not covered (italic).
Regarding 4G, the Fairphone 5 covers all LTE networks (bold) except for extended range band B25 (italics).
it doesn't support US bands for TMobile
It covers some, but not all.
I agree. Maybe immigrating Europe or emigrating the US, but that does seem odd.
This is already common usage and I don't see the need for any prefixes to the word.
As we've already seen in this thread, sometimes prefixes are needed to help establish the arrow of causation when people do migrate. Did they come to or leave from this or that country? Etc.
not the current english word.
Good thing language can change over time :)
I mean, you're right that Republicans taking away people's rights should be news. It should be the topmost article on a newspaper.
Right under that though should be the news about how the supposed opposition party caved in to the Republicans by agreeing and voting in favor, thereby increasing the Republicans' effective party size in the House.
Democratic representatives not representing their constituents should be news, but of course that news is as old as printing itself, much longer.
The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.
Irrelevant to this conversation.
Persons faced with an unconstitutional licensing law which purports to require a license as a prerequisite to exercise of right… may ignore the law and engage with impunity in exercise of such right.
By this logic, voter registration isn't in the constitution, so you might be able to make the argument that it violates the 14th, 15th, 19th, and 24th amendments. Again, by this logic, regardless of if people have proper voting registration or any voting registration at all, they should still be able to vote anyways. The 4 Democrats mentioned in the above article pass a law against the above.
The state cannot diminish the rights of the people.
Tell that to the Republicans that introduced the above bill.
there can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of constitutional rights
What about the right to protest of UCLA students last April being violated because of false claims of anti-semitism, or the right to protest of Columbia students last March because of similar false claims? Did the US care about imposing sanctions or penalties on those people, or did they just detain and deport them instead?
a person cannot be compelled “to purchase, through a license fee or a license tax, the privilege freely granted by the constitution.”
Again, tell that to Republicans that introduced the above bill.
people were immigrating from Europe
The linguistically correct term her would be emigrating from Europe.
to the US
This is immigrating.
emigrating to Europe
This is immigration.
from the US
The word you're looking for is emigration.
emigrating from Europe
You're correct here.
to the US
Once again, immigration.
immigrating to Europe
This is the linguistically correct use of the term.
from the US
Proper word would be emigrating.
Easiest solution is to say migrating
Migration by itself doesn't indicate whether you're referring to domestic-only movement, where people migrate inside of a country, or domestic-to-foreign where they cross a border, or foreign-to-foreign movement.
It all depends on the boundary you set.
If your chosen boundary is Europe, people moving to Europe are immigrating there, and people moving from Europe are emigrating there.
If your chosen boundary is the US, immigration is moving to the US while emigration is moving from the US.
Since migration isn't specific and can refer to any of the above cases, I prefer transmigration since "trans-" refers to "across" which I often interpret as "out from and in to".
We don't need to give up on prepositions in order to have more accurate language.
The majority of the population has departed from reality.
According to Ballotpedia, ~63.9% of the eligible US voting population (older than 18) turned out to vote, or ~155 mn people. This means ~36.1% didn't turn out, or ~88 mn people out of the ~243 mn total population. In 2020, the turnout rate was ~66.6% or ~158 mn, meaning ~33.4% or ~79 mn didn't vote out of the ~238 mn total population.
According again to Ballotpedia, 77 mn voted R in 2024 (49.8% of the voting population or 31.8% of the total population), ~75 mn voted D (48.3% of the voting population or 30.8% of the total population), and ~3 mn voted 3rd party (1.9% of the voting population or 1.2% of the total population).
In 2020, 81 mn voted D (51.3% of the voting population or 34.2% of the total population), ~74 mn voted R (46.9% of the voting population or ~31.2% of the total population), and ~3 mn voted 3rd party (1.8% of the voting population or ~1.2% of the total population).
You say majority, but clearly less than a third of adults in 2024 voted R.
I don't think we can say why the other ~88 million didn't vote. Sure, maybe some of them share a reality that diverges from the rest of the world. But we can speculate some other reasons too: maybe they were too apathetic because their party ran on issues not necessarily aligned to the views of their own, maybe they had to go to work to earn a paycheck, maybe they were turned away from the ballot box, maybe Joe Biden's approval ratings tanked and upon dropping out of the race, many people on election day still thought he was running, maybe Kamala didn't diverge enough away from Biden (or Republicans) to make a meaningful difference in voters' eyes, and maybe some of them didn't think women should be in office, with gender inequality still a prescient issue.
I liked Tim Walz's analogy in response to the Democrats' performance in 2024:
If a teacher teaches a subject, quizzes their class afterwards, and finds that less 100% of the class pass, the fault for that performance doesn't lie with the kids. The fault lies with the teacher. The teacher needs to teach concepts in multiple ways using different pedagogical methods to activate as many kids as possible.
Politicians are the same for me. If people aren't voting for you, a politician needs to speak to (and sometimes educate) the public in more ways than just one - and do so effectively.
Democrats dropped the ball this year. It still seems like they're dropping the ball in Congress. We'll see what the party does. I'd recommend they look to the progressive caucus with Bernie Sanders and AOC for the answer.
In my view, "migrate" according to Etymonline originates from the Proto-Indo-European (PIE) root *mei which means "to change, go, move".
I don't believe this term refers to moving in or out of something, or any other preposition.
As we've been discussing in this post, immigrate and emigrate represent inverses of each other. It makes sense to look for logical ways to combine those.
I think the best prefix for this would be trans- for, according to Etymonline, this means "across, beyond, through, on the other side of; go beyond". Specifically, I would refer to trans- as meaning "out from and in to", which gives us the word "transmigrate". Etymonline has a dictionary entry for "transmigration".
It looks like Merriam-Webster, Oxford, and American Heritage dictionaries support "transmigrate" as an entry.
According to Etymonline,
Immigrate = in- "into, in, on, upon" from PIE root *en + migrare "to move" from PIE root *mei
Emigrate = assimilated form of ex- "out" from PIE root *eghs + migrare "to move" from PIE root *mei
So I guess to correct usage would be:
Immigrating to Europe/US
Emigrating from US/Europe
Ugh you've just given me a new Deck project!
Hell yeah it does!
Even if he had gone all in on manufacturing, it's not like a supply network of industrial goods can be built in a day. Hell, it's hard to build that in a 4-year term. Trump is virtue signalling while at the same time jeopardizing any chance America had of reshoring.
It's honestly infuriating me how big projects needed to improve our infrastructure take years and years to complete, when from one administration to the next, those same projects can be cancelled.
It takes multiple presidencies to build something good, and it takes one to tear it all down.
I see now the benefits of China's 5 year plans with how well organized they can control their economy.
Good luck! Stay safe