Rediphile @ Rediphile @lemmy.ca

Posts

0

Comments

386

Joined

2 yr. ago

The reason they won't pay is specifically because people tip.

“I said, ‘Yes, Jews can exist, the Zionist ideology and the state of Israel cannot,'”

The article itself...

It's literally in the article.

And when/where/to who.

Edit: it states in the article what she said, which is that Israel should not exist.

Why would those other medications be more appropriate. What's the problem with Ketamine in the first place?

Or maybe don't work at such a place? Don't agree to an unfair deal. Quit. Force the employer to change.

To be clear, I'm anti-capitalist and not blaming poor people for anything, nor suggesting they should not have any children. But I stand by my position and wording.

Don't have more children (or even pets) than one can support. It's objectively cruel.

Would I prefer a world where there wasn't such dramatic (or ideally any) inequality? Definitely. But even in a world where every single parent could support 6 kids I'd be against people having 17.

I'm never having kids, by choice. How is that eugenics?

I'm just saying good parents consider what is best for their children before having them. Having 6 when you can only reasonable support 3 is a 'poor' choice. Bad parents, on the other hand, have children to benefit themselves rather than the child.

And anyway, statistically, lower income people have more children per person so no one is preventing poor people from having kids. I'm just questioning if that is what is best for those children, because I care about children's suffering.

Well yeah, but you probably make good choices which is arguably cheating.

Children are a choice, plan accordingly for the children's benefit.

And it has literally nothing to do with ethics and is profit driven. The entire point of advertising is to make money.

Yeah, but my sweet old grandma made it well into her 90s, so I'll stick to there not being a god. The biblical god would have smitted her down long ago.

That's cool. But the idea of a due date on digital media is also completely absurd, just give me the file. The entire point of libraries is to freely share information after all.

I can say I didn't try. Because I don't try.

Because even if they look for it and find it, whoever is riding just says it theirs and there is literally nothing the police can do unless it was caught on video or there is a meaningful identifying feature like a serial number or something else specific and unique.

Seeing a sketchy guy with a black and red bike with the same bike rack you had isn't enough to prove anything.

If an officer approached me riding my bike around and asked me to prove it's mine, I couldn't either despite not being a thief.

They can, and do, say that.

Edit: just without the you're not important to us part.

It's so funny hearing Americans talk about a feature that has been standard in Canada for almost a decade.

Like, we are usually the ones way behind with Uber and various other similar technology services. So not sure what happened on this one.

They will suffer. And I'm willing to be among them as it's worth it long term. The alternative of infinite growth isn't a realistic possibility in a world with finite resources.