Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)RE
Posts
2
Comments
191
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Probable? No, impossible? Also no. All it takes is being in the right place at the right time with the right method of killing. Too many people think Rambo or terminator when a car bomb or something like that can easily do the trick. Or poison, etc. Hell even just sniping them during a public appearance.

  • God damn us internet vets have seen the rise and fall of many a digital empire. Refugees moving from 1 shell to the next,

    IRC/AIM->Skype/vent/mumble->discord/signal/telegram,

    netscape->IE->Firefox/Chrome/Chromium,

    message boards/use groups->digg/reddit->Lemmy,

    Search engines like ask jeeves->Google/yahoo->google.

    Napster->kazaa/limewire->torrents/magnet links->Sonarr/Streaming Sites

    I could go on but yeah it was insane.

  • Nope but it's a case by case basis. The burden of proof is on the prosecution but the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence, depending on the accusation laid. If I punch you but you don't report it till the bruise is gone for what ever reason and you have no witnesses or evidence to prove it, did a crime still occurr?

  • i sometimes quote some of my favorites to the young generation and they look at me like im insane. 10-10-220, only a buck for the first 5 minutes and just a quarter after that for any long distance phone call!

  • Not at all, I personally have no pony in this race. But if the issue never went to trial he literally wasn't found innocent. No trial = No guilt or innocence legally speaking. Getting charges dismissed doesn't automatically equate legally either to guilt or innocence under the circumstances that he got for dismissal. The only qualifier is "there wasn't enough evidence produced to make this worth the courts time." Now if that means to you he's automatically been proven "innocent" I don't know what to tell you. To me it doesn't mean he's innocent, just the other party couldn't reliably prove their accusations. I do notice you are silent about the grooming thing though.

    It's also interesting to see people making the comparisons to Depp and Heard trial when they did actually prove Depp was abusive towards Heard but Heard wasn't a saint either. Anyone who actually paid attention to the trial without any bias can in no logical mind think either of them were innocent angels.

  • I mean one is discussed in the article linked....

    But there are 2 different accusation cases:

    1st: accused of domestic abuse, false imprisonment, menacing, and something else by ex girlfriend. The charges were dropped but not because he was declared innocent but because "We dismissed the charges today as a result of having insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt." Which is legalese for them saying "there isn't enough evidence to say he did or didn't do it besides hearsay so we have to dismiss the charges. So again he wasn't "found innocent", they just never went to trial.

    2nd: he's been accused of grooming multiple under age Rick and Morty fans. A plethora of fans have come forward with incriminating pictures of messages from their convos on various messenger services. This one hasn't had much traction since like January but it happened at the same as his domestic abuse case was going public.

  • Defederate from those ass holes, zuck can get bent and a whole slew of other bad things. Stupid ass hasn't done anything of value and still acts like the dumb ass college kid bragging about getting people to give them all their personal details to use his crummy site.