Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
0
Comments
808
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • My man just had a mental break and hit post anyway.

  • Every time I think we've reached the bottom, Republicans dig just a little deeper.

  • Stress

    Jump
  • I work at an understaffed convenience store/fast food fusion. The amount of people who make their dogshit life choices my problem makes me look longingly at tall bridges.

  • RIP Kabosu :/

    Jump
  • Started with Dog, ended with Doge. We've come full circle.

  • The mere existence of the things I linked you is pretty overwhelming evidence. Feel free to refute it at your leisure.

  • And I explained to you that these models aren't incapable of learning, they're given artificial restrictions not to in order to prevent what I linked from happening. They don't learn to preserve the initial experience but are the exact same kind of AI. Generative.

  • Only 29%? The fuck does Nintendo even have on there?

  • About which part? The part that they can remember and expand their training data to new interactions but often become corrupted by them so much so that the original intent behind the AI is irreversibly altered? That's been around for about a decade. How about the fact they're "not faking it" because the added capacity to compute and generate the new content has to have sophisticated plans just to continue running in a timely manner?

    I'd love to know which part you took issue with but you seemingly took my advice to shut the fuck up and I do profoundly appreciate it.

  • .. No. They're instanced so that when a new person interacts with them, they don't have the memories of interacting with the person before them. A clean slate, using only the training data in the form the developers want it to. It's still AI, it's just not your girlfriend. The fact you don't realize that they do and can learn after their training data proves people just hate what they don't understand. I get it, most people don't even know the difference between a neural network and AI because who has the time for that? But if you just sit here and go "nuh uh they're faking it" rather than push people and yourself to learn more, I invite you, cordially, to shut the fuck up.

    Dipshits giving their opinions as fact is a scourge with no cure.

  • Interesting. Now, who do we thank for this post? checks notes

  • Sex scenes can absolutely feed a narrative purpose, like in Game of Thrones where it's almost always a political motivation or has a greater meaning to it. However, if I wanted to watch two people have sex, I would go to a different site to watch it/wouldn't go to a movie theater for it.

    People aren't upset about sex scenes, they're upset about unnecessary ones.

  • Sadly, I've seen more absurd comments be said with complete seriousness. I wish it weren't hard to tell.

  • "I will now be regressing the equality she attempted to create in an attempt to be petty."

    I need to take a psychology class because I just can't fucking understand people.

  • Yes, yes and then we do experiments on them without their knowledge to gauge how they react as opposed to control vaults. We should also name this department something fitting. Since they're working on new technologies with vaults maybe something like.. Vault-tec

  • Ironically, it's called toxic buildup and it can be less than being underground :)

  • Mood debuff from the game Rimworld where if you spend too long without going outside, you get a severe penalty.

    In other words, being underground for long (or indefinite) periods would probably have a profoundly negative effect on people's moods.

  • Online communities are hostile. Period. Stop making everything gendered.

  • When HOA Karens actually move up in the world only to fuck it up for a larger area.

  • This is getting out of hand. /x