Independent, undecided voters are pretty stupid and believe the last thing they hear more often than not. See 2016 election and the final major hit to Hilary in the polls because Comey's last minute FBI report about reopening her investigation that the Republicans spun.
If the Democrat isn't out front and center showing off their accomplishments AND showing how cost effective they were, undecided voters will not research any deeper than the headlines and happily believe what GOP talking heads say if the other side doesn't refute them loudly and with conviction.
Rule one of management is their problem is everyone below thems problem. Conflicting info/orders? You should know who is right. Bad info given? Why did you do something so dumb? Short staffed? Figure it out. Day side is short? Why arent you helping your team?
If you have any responsibilities on overnights save for run a machine to hit quotas there is always going to be some dumb mandate or oversight from management on the dayside that your team is going to take a hit for.
As a night shifter, occasionally this is a perk. You can get simple questioned answered the same day, and if there is ever some kind of policy issue it can be brought to their attention relatively easily. To say nothing of an emergency situation where you need someone above shift supervisor, management may say call them in an emergency but they never answer their phone at 3am but god forbid you don't pick up on the third ring at 2pm when you've been asleep since noon.
Good luck explaining infinite atmosphere would mean infinite gravity and we'd be crushed into a black hole.
But yeah, sure. Earth is the flat object in the observable universe and NASA totally has the power and budget to make possible test you can do to prove otherwise wrong.
I actually looked into this one, was honestly surprised she's registered as Independent, not Republican. Can't really find more info on her at the moment aside from her resignation so can't say for sure if she worked with GOP at all or just was a terrible person for some other reason.
Big enough nerd to know the canonical answer was both.
The exterior of the Death star all had gravity pointed down towards the middle of the station. However once you got past this defensive layer artificial gravity was oriented like the left side.
I don't see how your post refutes his? Russia is big, but it's sparsely populated, especially anywhere east of Moscow until you get to Vladivostok. Countries other than Russia in their grid equally if not more so sparsely populated. Top that with disparities in Quality of Life between the two grids, and you find the larger one using less power because it's services less clients who use less electricity.
Accounting for mining, construction, operation, decommission and disposal, nuclear has less emission that Solar.
The political problems are entirely artificial, fabricated by the fossil fuel competitors and have been soundly disproven.
Nuclear waste is no where near the problem people assume it is. A single plant doesn't produce more than it can store onsite during it's entire operation and 100% of all the waste can actually be recycled and ran through newer generation breeder reactors to 'burn' the radioactivity and render the resulting 'waste' safe as background radiation within a decade or so in a cooling pool. The only reason this isn't already common practice is nuclear fuel is so abundant it's not as profitable to do this, It'd be the equivalent of a coal power plant halting using coal for a few weeks so they could shovel in trash from a nearby landfill until it was empty. Less overall power output for less profit.
Some remind me of this in 3 months.