That headline had nothing to do with the rest of the article. Concerns of bankers were never addressed, focusing instead on regulators. Which is all well and good, but not what I hoped to read.
Take off your tinfoil hat. Maybe set down the vape. Lying? I was responding to incomplete information. Not everything's a conspiracy. This is an old law now being applied to new technology. Nothing infuriating about it.
I mean, if enough vaporizers have to be re-shipped because they were stolen before they're received, yes, of course. You're not going to expect to pay a second time for something you never received. The insurance company (I assume this is medical use?) or the supplier doesn't want to pay a second time. Of course they're going to make you sign. It's not a law to stop porch pirates, it's a law to reduce costs.
In the U.S., we have given our third-party Trusted Technology Provider access to the code that drives the content you see - the For You feed - and we are on a path to allowing an unprecedented amount of third-party access to verify our source code and systems, something no other peer company has done.
Maintenance of the Pearl Harbor National Memorial's integrity through regular upkeep of facilities and landscapes. Prioritization of the safety, conservation, and historical preservation to honor the site's significance and ensure an enriching experience for visitors.
How TF does this do anything to mitigate climate change?
Meh, that's me. I don't so much protest gentrification as much as I want to work to ensure my neighbors can continue to live here and reap the benefits themselves as the neighborhood improves. You can't convince me that the people who have lived here for decades want to live in neglected, under-developed, under-supported, neighborhoods. They just don't want to be forced out as change happens.
That headline had nothing to do with the rest of the article. Concerns of bankers were never addressed, focusing instead on regulators. Which is all well and good, but not what I hoped to read.