Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)RA
Posts
3
Comments
1,051
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Why am I skirting any rule? Those like you include you. I've even said explicitly on your quote.

    You were fooled and you're trying to defend it as some form of moral superiority. You don't care about Gaza, you care more about not admitting you were wrong.

    Go ahead and report me, just be careful to not fall from your high horse.

  • It's not even that. It's not a chess AI or a AGI (which doesn't exist). It will speak and pretend to play, but has no memory of the exact position of the pieces nor the capability to plan several steps ahead. For ask intended and porpoises, it's like asking my toddler what's the time (she always says something that sounds like a time, but doesn't understand the concept of hours or what the time is)

    The fact that somebody posted this on LinkedIn and not only wasn't shamed out of his job but there are several articles about it is truly infuriating.

  • In their defense, it's very expected that some people can be so stupid as to think Trump was not going to be worse for Gaza. And Ukraine. And Europe. And US. But I guess you are.

    That's why they can you "useful idiot"

    Edit: to be clear, I don't mean "you" in particular, but those like you in general.

  • Is this Musk's and meta end goal? Make internet ultra shitty so that every social network needs age verification/user real data so they can use their dominant position to target people more viciously?

    It's not like of 99% of people cares about giving their actual name and details.

  • Yes and no. The same comment on different communities can have vastly different results, so I think it's too easy to just "justify" why the ratios you don't agree with are there, while the ones you do are obviously "fair"

  • Your reasoning is a random one, with the exact same validity and any other random one. "What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence" rings any bell?

    Everybody hates Russia and would be eager to fight if Russia didn't have nuclear bombs. Remove the critical voices and we are ready to go.

    Wait, you claim "everybody" hates Russia but doesn't fight because Russia has nuclear bombs, so they are removing critical voices to be able to attack... Are nuclear weapons powered by critical voices? Or are you hallucinating?

  • Trying to paint hexbear as anything other than in complete full support of lgbtqiat, which the vast majority of us are, is absurd and insulting.

    Well, I guess you can feel insulted then.