Not really the same thing, but I kinda love my desk vape (Arizer xq2 if I remember correctly). Just slowly smoking it for 30 minutes like a hookah while watching a movie is definitely a different experience to ripping a bowl and forgetting what you wanted to do
I don't understand what point are you trying to make. Yes, AI, and everything else artificial is man made, I never said it was not. Is it anywhere good as the human intelligence? No, I was also clear about that, so what are you arguing right now? The original argument was whether LLM counts as AI (and existence of AI itself), and by every definition, it does.
Why is it so hard for you to understand word "artificial"? It seems like you even avoid it. Just like artificial everything, especially weed and flavours, it's not the real thing, and was never meant to be the real thing, and yet you're essentially an old man yelling at cloud because something is artificial and does not act like the real human intelligence
I genuinely do not understand these very obviously biased comments. By the very definition of AI, we have had it for decades, and suddenly people say we don't have it? I don't get it. Do you hate LLMs so much you want to change the entire definition for AI (and move it under AGI or something)? This feels unhinged, disconnected from reality, biases so strong it looks like delusions
From what I know, pewdiepie 2025 is nothing like old pewdiepie. Used to review memes, now makes vlogs with his wife and kid while enjoying new life in Japan. Basically retired
This is like saying "Easily available drugs from deep web is nothing new", but after deep web protocol got integrated into the chrome with black market set as homepage
I understand your core argument, but it's weak. Fentanyl exists for 70 years, but only in the last 10 or so years it became problematic due to availability
Evil shit that was hard to do 20 years ago, is slowly becoming accessible to every dumb jackass you know that doesn't know what command prompt is
Fair, but there is an argument to be made about how hosting things are now cheaper than ever, by a huge margin. When 1GB used to cost 1 dollar, they had 30% cut. Now when that's 0.01 not 1, 100x the difference (while games have gotten like what, 10x bigger?), it's still 30%.
But you know what is the most damning argument against their cut? Steam earns more money per employee than next 3 companies combined and Gabe is buying fleet of yachts and multiple submarines, not even getting into real estate, while indie devs are going broke one after another. That cut might make a major difference for devs, but at this point Gabe has already too much money and won't suffer from having less of it, which is really not consumer or developer friendly thing to do, basically hoarding riches like other billionaires
Actually my distrust comes from theor reporting on eastern europe, the place I live in, and you sound completely insane, ironically