Yeah, I agree, but only somewhat. I'm not informed enough to know whether your assumption that there wasn't continuous effort to put that into law is correct. Definitely I agree in principal! I have a significant amount of frustration with our representatives that haven't pulled through.
Well, they're not interested in the rule of law and believe themselves untouchable. They've curried immense favor with the paramilitaries by pardoning the J6 traitors and now have their own personal army.
Someone recently told me about the 3 questions. I've been trying to apply it as much as possible, especially online. I'm happy to see this in the wild. Thanks!
I kinda had the same feeling after reading it, I'm disappointed that I wasn't surprised, as in, I kind of figured the cops were all in these groups anyway but the confirmation doesn't give me the feel goods.
I think that they're talking about the wholesale rejection of all that is feminine. Especially growing up, any boy that demonstrated any kind of feminine traits or who was not "all boy" was ridiculed. That's what needs to change. Any weakness ridiculed, any sensitivity crushed... It's a wonder that there are any kind men at all.
Came here to say this;
The state's actions show a disturbing pattern where they:
Refused to help Brittany Wise with $10,000 in housing debt when she proactively asked for assistance to keep her family together
Then spent at least $6,200 per month (likely much more given special needs) to separate her children and place them in foster care - far exceeding what it would have cost to simply help with housing
Made her children's situation actively worse by:
Splitting up siblings who previously lived together
Placing children with behavioral challenges in unstable situations
Having some kids spend nights in DFCS offices due to lack of placements
Traumatizing a 9-year-old who just wanted to celebrate his birthday with his mom
Choice of policy priorities is telling: The state dedicates less than 0.5% of its $450 million family preservation budget to housing assistance, despite housing being the third most common reason for separating families
The math alone exposes the reality - this isn't about costs or helping families. If it were, they would spend the smaller amount on housing assistance rather than the larger amount on foster care. The system seems designed to punish poverty by taking children from struggling parents rather than helping stabilize families in crisis.
When the state chooses to spend more money to break up a family than it would cost to keep them together, that reveals the true priority isn't the wellbeing of children or fiscal responsibility - it's exerting control and punishing parents for being poor.
ɔiƚoxɘup @ Quexotic @beehaw.org Posts 15Comments 459Joined 2 yr. ago
You should also avoid putting lentils in all the caps. Doing so may accidentally slowly deflate all 4 tires.