Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)PU
Posts
5
Comments
383
Joined
12 mo. ago

  • It's a shame they never gonna bother with DLC, I had at least hoped that they'd add in the parts from the endgame that they scrapped. Supposedly there was an entire Upper City part which they scrapped. I think it included the vampire castle, which they moved and is why it's in such a weird spot in the Lower City now.

  • It takes only a minute to check on Metacritic what the majority of negative reviews are about.

    There are a few legit ones, but most are just trashtalking Ubisoft. Or saying horsecrap like "looks like PS3 games", which it clearly doesn't. Or every positive review is "paid by Ubisoft", and people even complaining about it being a woke political agenda, fucking lmao.

    I strongly doubt these trolls even installed the game.

  • I had a lot of crashes back at launch, but after trying out a lot of things I think it eventually came down to my GPU being undervolted, didn't have a single crash since. The undervolt worked fine with Wukong, but that game isn't even remotely the same scale as Outlaws.

    Been at it for about 23 hours, I think 'worst' in-game bug I had was Kay's hands acting weird on a speeder once, like she was grabbing the air.

  • Lol people in this sub shitting on others for enjoying a game that they hate. Must be hard to comprehend the fact that tastes can differ.

    It's been a genuinely enjoyable game for me so far. Of course not without minor issues, but it does not even remotely deserve the hate it gets.

  • I never said I assume that every bad review is from someone who hasn't played.

    But you can't ignore the insane amount of hate Ubisoft is getting for the most insignificant non-issues just because they're Ubisoft. It takes like a few seconds to notice how the troll armies are linking stuff from various clickbait YouTubers and streamers on social media, and no doubt a vast majority of negative feedback is coming from there.

    I'm not ignoring the legit issues this game has, because they are definitely present. And I'm doing my part in reporting them to Ubisoft, instead of making trollposts about it on social media, so we can all enjoy a better game. Sadly that isn't part of the majority's crusade against Ubisoft, they're just out there farming internet points, banking on the circlejerk hate.

    I can almost guarantee that the upcoming Metacritic user reviews are a prime example of "Hue hue Ubisoft bad".

  • It really isn't a bad game.

    I'm 7 hours in and having a blast (pun intended). It's an alright game if you're not into SW, it's an awesome game if you are. Reminds me a lot of Hogwarts Legacy, the game didn't bring anythinbg new to the market, but it's fun if you're into the theme.

    There have been a few technical difficulties but nothing as bad as games I played before, which got much higher ratings and didn't get blasted for it as hard as people do with this game.

    People just really let their hate for Ubisoft take over and jump on that social bandwagon for internet points, even though the game plays barely like any other Ubisoft game I've played in the past 30 years.

    I bet later today Metacritic user reviews will be flooded with people who haven't even played the game and just base their entire opinion on a few buggy game clips.

  • Frankly it's not even a big deal. There is still the special ability that lets you shoot multiple targets like Red Dead, but I basically never use it.

    I don't really got the impression that the main character is the kind that does random ghetto drive-bys from a speeder.

  • It's alright at best. It's just like so many other souls-like games, it's just visually way ahead of the others. Which comes at the cost of very heavy hardware demand.

    Other than that I feel like it's overhyped as hell. I did the first chapter and frankly I'm not sure how this game would ever hit 95% score on Steam if it didn't have China's community backing it. Feels like a 70-75% game at best to me.

  • The main trilogy hasn't been great.

    But so much other content, from books (High Republic and other novels) to games (Jedi and Battlefront) to other movies (Rogue One, Solo) and shows (Andor, Ahsoka, Mandalorian, Bad Batch, Clone Wars) have been mostly amazing.

    Star Wars is only "dead" if you live in that artificial negative hellhole the online community created.

  • My comment applies to industries beyond SW as well, it has become part of the cancel culture these days. SW is just an infamous example since the new Disney movies released. Thing is that these huge corporations try to appeal to a much larger crowd than previously (this goes for other companies too) and that doesn't always fit within people's personal narrative.

    I get that some don't agree with choices being made, but these aren't being made just for them. Yet a lot of people abuse this excuse to make it like a religious crusade against these corporations, a ride that a lot of people hop on to, who had nothing to do with the whole thing in the first place and just tag along for their entertainment instead of just moving along.

    This game is a good example too, a lot of people just tag along with the collective hate for Ubisoft. But when you ask them the general response will be "bEcAUse iT's uBiSOft" and have no constructive argument. Some will say it's because the game is using the usual Ubisoft formula (it doesn't, but that aside), so what? A lot of people do enjoy that formula, and all the people that don't like it can move along, big enough of a world out there to find something they do enjoy, including other SW games in a variety of genres.

  • Have you seen the actual "criticism" lately? Like 99% of the stuff I've read from SW "fans" are anything but legit criticism, just trolls incessantly bitching for the sake of bitching in an attempt to raise their social media scores by lifting on the circlejerks just hating without any constructive feedback.

  • A lot of people that played the previews were quite optimistic about the game, save for a few gripes that seem to reflect in most reviews now. But the online community has been rather toxic about a variety of things, ranging from valid concerns to pointless hate. There was one IGN preview that looked pretty bland and bad, but everything else looked alright.

    It's not an innovating game, but frankly I never expected it to be. It looks like a fun immersive experience for SW fans (the actual fans, not the ones that hate literally everything about SW lol).

  • I played it on PS5 back when it came out, which was rough but eventually playable enough to deal with it.

    There have been a bunch of performance updates since then but I don't know how much it improved on PC. I think it's still quite a demanding game.

  • Well like I said, there are a lot of alternative games out there that are suited to a more casual crowd. It's good that developers still make games like Kingdom Come and Baldur's Gate to provide for players looking for more depth, immersive and engaging content.

    Also, turn-based games are timeless, just like many other genres that have been around for 30+ years. I know a bunch of people that would never touched these kind of games and got completely hooked on BG3 anyway. Even myself that was never really into these kind of RPGs and tried Divinity games before, BG3 was absolutely stellar. It's one of those games that set a new standard many others could learn from these days.