PugJesus @ PugJesus @lemmy.world

Cripple. History Major. Irritable and in constant pain. Vaguely Left-Wing.

---

Read more

Posts

1,523

Comments

4,180

Joined

2 yr. ago

Wouldn't that be ridiculous

This is one of them classic, body-horror angels

hongry

Are you kidding ??? What the **** are you talking about man ?

but getting mad at them now after you’ve prevented them from doing anything at all just seems petty.

It would seem to be a trend.

They're such adorable little genetic dead-ends!

[Pug noise]

It is a bit disturbing that we bred a dog variant with the ability to scream.

The same kinds of Very Serious Leftists who are now saying spontaneous revolutionary action is the only solution that is acceptable.

I remember constant complaints of "The Dems didn't even TRY anything, they should have proposed bills even if they knew it would fail!" before the second Trump presidency.

Now it seems the chorus has changed to "I can't believe they're trying something they know will fail!"

Curious.

no you dumb fuck: this is a physical act that carries a symbolic significance.

"My useless symbolic action will make the masses Rise Up(tm), while THEIR useless symbolic action won't!"

👏

just fuck off and say you’re a coward and violence isn’t the answer blah blah liberal nonsense fuck you.

Sorry that I find the idea that Congressmembers brawling will help our situation at all risible.

You want to use violence as the answer to this question, get real about it, not asking clerks and octogenarians to get into slapfights in the halls of Congress on your behalf in the strange hope that it'll cause a mass uprising wherein you won't have to lift a finger.

oh it wouldn’t!

So, “They’re pandering to the wrong people; I want them to pander by doing different useless symbolic actions.”

So you agree with my comment you originally objected to. Good. Glad we're in agreement.

Okay, how will AOC 'beating the shit' out of GOP Congressmen stop ICE from deporting children?

So, "They're pandering to the wrong people; I want them to pander by doing different useless symbolic actions."

About what I figured.

Okay. So will breaking decorum, yelling, and screaming will 'pass' or stop fascism?

please do something more. please do something that fucking matters.

Okay.

As members of Congress, what, exactly, should they be doing?

https://elderscrolls.fandom.com/wiki/Boethiah

Things Fall Apart

Now on my to-read list!

This is a bit dramatized especially with “fucking children”. I’d like to see sources to back up such emotional claims, especially the chest-thumping parts eg. “Not own their children”. Families lived together and children weren’t treated like chattel. You exaggerated here.

"They weren't chattel slaves, their children were just bound to lord and land in perpetuity"

Cool cool cool

“Nearly half of your working days” is an overstatement and labor obligations were typically 2–3 days a week plus extra during harvest (boon days).

Sunday off, at least pro forma.

Would you like to remind me what percentage 3 is of 6.

Enclosing timing and large-scale commons stripping were much more severe in the 15th–16th centuries than the 14th. While some pressures started in the late 13th, it wasn’t yet widespread.

"It was more severe later" doesn't at all modify the point.

I can see why you had to be pressured to write a complete response.

I can see why you didn't address the vast majority of my points, and why the points you did address, you did so without strong arguments.

ha ha yeah 700 ELO look at those midwits

(hides sub-200 ELO)

Many would own neither their land nor their hovel. The lucky ones would own themselves, at least; the unlucky ones would not only not own themselves nor their hovel, but also not own their own fucking children - nearly half of England's population was unfree. Of the free half, a majority of them would not have owned any land in any real sense. They lived on their lord's sufferance.

Their access to the commons was dependent on the goodwill of their local lord, and, indeed, as the 14th century comes into play, that access is stripped as soon as it becomes more profitable for the local lord to sell the rights off.

10% of their harvest would go to the Church alone - not optional. Much more would go to their local lord simply for the privilege of existing - around 25% if you were free, closer to 50% if you were unfree. And that's not getting into various other taxes, such as for anything sold, or to get permission to marry. And if you were unfree, you'd owe nearly half of your working days to your lord's needs - without any recompense, in money or produce. On top of that, many taxes levied were irregular - ie whenever your lord thought he could get away with it.