Skip Navigation

Psyhackological
Posts
22
Comments
431
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Yeah that's a better opinion than mine.

  • My opinion: let's separate the software and the people making it. If it's great tool and FOSS why not use it? You use software, not people.

    EDIT: I know that FOSS heavily relies on community but also that's the point. I don't see how toxic comminity can progress further while more open minded and kind fork will be a better choice of the same software base.

  • Ah, I see, I thought so.

  • You could list it, but I tried to migrate Obsidian to Logseq. For now, I have no time. I mostly write MarkDown though.

  • So it's a layer that says "bro I got this, don't mind that I run this game in the background and let take care of resolution with Hz"?

  • Ah I see so you can look up in game what are the best responses for your opening. Smart.

  • I cannot get the same features on the desktop so it's synced up. Besides that only Taks.org on Android is even better than Todoist.

  • Your response: because it makes him money especially when he has Chess.com logo hidden somewhere when he streams.

  • Lichess does tell too.

  • What are the sideffects of gamescope? Can I specify which monitor the game is running?

  • What NAS do you use?

  • Why is Zed (Semi)Libre Software? Do you know something that I don't?

  • Maybe just say why it is better:

    • No ads / subscriptions
    • No tracking
    • Free software is really fast
    • You can do many projects with Lichess
    • Clean non-cluttered UI

    So, in summary, it's not hyped up (marketing), clean, no tracking, free chess.com experience.

    I don't know what are the advantages' chess.com has over Lichess right now. The chess should be free.

  • FOSS-y

  • What are you recommendation of decent NAS with freeBSD?

  • No problem, that was the first thing that interested me into this topic.

  • You're right, thanks! Sounded too convoluted.

  • How about something more recent? :)