Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)PS
Posts
0
Comments
530
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Depends heavily on the libertarian. Big tent and all. I'd consider most libertarians minarchists that are willing to accept some government for things they don't feel can be handled voluntarily. Usually property, defense, police, fire and most court shit.

    For ancaps/voluntarists check out poly-centric law.

    There are quite a few ideas mostly based on how people think we can least coerce others with violence and how imaginative they are.

    Trade is a technology that has to be developed. If you freeze it then you halt progress. The best we can think of now may not be the best way tomorrow.

  • Online in particular is a crap shoot. It's a small enough demographic that it's easy to be overrun.

    In 15 years my local LP has gone from weird old racist fucks to younger people that are pretty fantastic. The 2020 state convention had me pleasantly surprised. We were heavily involved in supporting the pro-choice vote we had (and won) and, while the dinosaurs aren't dead, they were completely ostracized.

  • You just establish robust self defense. Protecting strictly property isn't part of it. If someone is actively attacking you, your family, whatever, self-defense pops in. After that, a less fucky justice system that focuses on making the victim whole rather than retribution would be lovely.

  • It's pretty standard private property ideas. Most are still kind of stuck in the (leftist definition) capitalist version of property where you kind of assume everything is already owned by someone and we toil for property.

    I don't think it's necessary to go down that path, but I'm sort of neutral on how society chooses to handle it. I prefer the more homestead/robust abandonment types.