Prunebutt @ Prunebutt @slrpnk.net

Posts

10

Comments

1,314

Joined

2 yr. ago

Good thing he's not the sole person in carge of the election, then, huh?

Also: not what I said. 🙄

Also: Matt probably won't sell my data to Palantir and ad tech businesses.

You don't get to police what gender people find acceptable to be called. You're closer to Trump's ideology than I am if you don't get that.

Ok, enough fun. Again: Stop wasting your time on electoralism. You want conspiracies? The US is completely run by lobbyists and capitalists. Liberal democracy is a scam. Read Marx and Peter Gelderloos.

I'll block you now. Have fun hunting down the Illuminati.

Yes. My gender. Don't call me Jack.

Sugar, I'm an embedded software engineer. Try mansplaining tosomeone else.

The source code was leaked. It didn't say anything about compromized firmware being flashed.

sorry, I've got like three other people who

Then that's on you. Don't multitask that much if you'd like to be taken seriously.

sorry, I've got like three other people who have never heard of the fake elector's plot talking to me at the same time as you are, so I have to basically explain it over and over to you guys.

As I've already pointed out. I know of that shit and I don't think it's plausible that it would have worked this year if it was already public and didn't work 4 years ago. Also: I don't care. I'm not an electoralist. Stop wasting your time with elections.

haha, nope, there are groups of people that do things together.

Yup. Guess what: the conspiracyis that electoralism alone will lead to progressive change.

I'll take my own advice and not waste any more time with your stupid conspiracy theories of your useless elections. I'd suggest you'd do the same, sugarplum.

Next rude comment will result in a permanent block.

There's edits which clarify and there's edits which completely change the message retroactively. Guess which one is horrible?

yeah dude if you don't understand what I'm saying that's on you.

That's what the madman shouting gibberish at the town square claims, too.

bully for you. I'm not getting bogged down in your tangential nitpicking.

ok, so I take that as an admission that you didn't watch the video. You've yet to mention one singular point she actually made. And you called her "right wing". XD

what, did I guess your actual name accidentally? The most common name in the states?

Sugar, you're adorable if you think you're clever.

it's insane you don't know about the fake electors scheme and you have the hollow temerity to speak about politics.

Willie knows and Willie doesn't care.

so... how was the 2004 election stolen? The one where the most popular candidate won and all that?

"Cordroom sins"? O.o

I don't like you assuming my gender, homie.

I'd like for people not lying about shit they said.

Edit: so you think that shit went puplic 4 years ago and didn't even work back then would work now, when everybody knows he already tried to pull that shit?

I don't understand how the software sourcecode having leaked means that machines have been compromized. That only means thatecurity through obscurity policies won't work anymore. But that's a horrible policy.

Edit your comment. I don't understand squat.

I get that you don't like edits, but you should get into that because you make a lot of mistakes with what you write.

Wrong. I edit all the time, since I make typos a lot. What I don't like is backpedaling liars.

I use speech to text and then edit manually.

Then edit them before you hit send. 🙄

doesn't change the facts Jack.

Don't call me Jack.

made up your little stories.

What did I make up?

I edited my comments before you asked me

That's a horrible way to write on lemmy.

you can scroll up and try reading for a change.

I read your comments. It's not on me to check every minute wether or not you edited them since then.

also stop talking about 2000

You brought it up, smartass.

the guy was right about the 2004 election

Sure he was. /s

(that's another edit I made again before you asked me the question).

If you write shit you didn't want to and I reference what you wrote first, that's on you, not me.

because she isn't calling for a recount

wrong again. From the transcript:

Over the coming months, officials in every county will be certifying that the election was fair. Or as “fair” as our elections get these days. If that includes some hand-counting of ballots, I’m all for it. If someone wants to file a lawsuit to force the hand-counting of ballots, I’m all for that, too. Election transparency is good, even if it tells us something we desperately do not want to hear: that Donald Trump won the 2024 election.

and just accept this possible conspiracy even though we all know that conservatives perpetrated a similar conspiracy for years ago.

Where does she claim that? I'd like a quote.

Don't call me Jack.

yeah dude, i didn't answer you before you asked a question.

1. I am not your dude. Don't call me that.
2. "I literally addresses that" implies that I ignored your other comment... before it existed...

concrete facts

lol

I've never necountered the term before. But your delusional, lying style is exactly how I would picture democrat simps who drink a Qanon style kool-aid

You are quite a good example of a blueAnon user. Have fun in your fantasy world where everyone but you is stupid and right wing.

The guy was right before, we should do a recount, she just wants to pretend that "conspiracies" aren't real despite the elector fraud scheme that happened 4 years ago.

That's not what she said. You can read it up in the transcript.

Need I go on? This “lifelong Republican,” (as he stated in his letter to Kamala Harris) has previously campaigned to reverse the 2004 election in which George W. Bush beat John Kerry–the year Bush won even the popular vote, by the way, not the year he actually stole the election in Florida.

He never questioned the 2000 election. She agrees that that one might have been stolen, but the dude claimed that 2004 was stolen. Not 2000.

So, what did you edit your comments for, if not for editing you calling her "right wing". I can't prove it, because lemmy doesn't preserve edit history, but you called her right wing twice, then edited them, then called me a liar for referencing that.

So, why did you edit your posts? Why are you claiming pi-oting on what the video says? How is it defeatist, if it actually agrees with your points?

What did you edit your comment for, then. You called her right wing twice and then edited it to say first "lying", then "defeatist".

how I referenced all of her points

What? When? Where?

that they matched up with exactly what I said and what the article says.

Lol, sure. /s

So you don't even admit that you called her right wing?

I literally addressed her points in the other comment.

You didn't at the time I wrote the other comment. Again: wtf are you trying to pull off, lying and shit?

she basically agrees with me. the guy was right before 2000, we know that Republicans do steal elections and try to steal one 4 years ago, so we should do recounts this time.

No, she doesn't. He didn't claim anything like that in 2000. From the transcript:

Need I go on? This “lifelong Republican,” (as he stated in his letter to Kamala Harris) has previously campaigned to reverse the 2004 election in which George W. Bush beat John Kerry–the year Bush won even the popular vote, by the way, not the year he actually stole the election in Florida.

you didn't watch her video did you?

First, you call her right wing, then you claim that she's lying, then you claim that she agrees with you by misquoting her. Pathetic.

Yeah. and then you acted as if you never called her right-wing.