ProdigalFrog @ ProdigalFrog @slrpnk.net

A frog who wants the objective truth about anything and everything.

---

Read more

Posts

506

Comments

1,101

Joined

2 yr. ago

Moderating

---

Forgotten Weapons put out an interesting theory of Stacked Tolerances being the culprit.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3iWVs2uD1XY

They only liked state's rights when it enabled them to hurt others and line their pockets.

Now that the fed is letting them do that, state's rights can be tossed aside until they need it again.

Best of luck! :D

We put together a privacy guide with different tiers of inconvenience, which you may or may not find helpful:

https://slrpnk.net/post/17910446

This blog is clearly AI slop.

I wouldn't focus too much on the anachronistic technology, that's more to keep with the vibe of the original trilogy.

The farming audits, IMO, are pretty directly an analog to what ICE is doing in the US.

There's definitely some WW2 influence and stylistic choices, if anything that's to keep the execs willing to fund the thing, but later on you'll see some more blatant comparisons to our modern situation.

They're really not. I'd recommend reading the Dawn if Everything by anthropologist David Graeber and Archeologist David We grow, which reveals that our true 'human nature' is actually egalitarianism and cooperation, and that our current modes of existence are an oddly different blip on the timeline of humanity.

I was thinking Mon Mothma's speech, in particular.

Season 1 is, yes. Season 2 is very much targeting today.

Andor.

Damn, that sucks :(

Is it... Is it supposed to spoil so much?

The video is about a retro game, it's just that the retro game has content you don't like and don't want other people talking about.

Far as I can tell, it does that when the phone is running low on ram. At least, that's when it does it to me.

I think the analogy holds up beautifully.

The man proceeds to tell the booth talkers that he's taken great pains to avoid seeing or hearing politics in his daily life, such as quickly muting political ads on TV, requesting his neighbors take down their Trump flags and local candidate election signs in their yard, and taking backroads to avoid seeing a political billboard on the way to work, all in the effort to spare their eyes the misfortune of sliding across disgusting politics. So it's perfectly reasonable that he demand to the booth talkers they cease their discussion immediately, and switch to a topic he approves of, he explains, confident in the knowledge that they will understand the pains he's gone through.

The two people in the booth glance at each other uncomfortably, wondering what terrible fate brought this demanding and oddly entitled man to their booth. Finally, one of them flashes a half-grin and spreads their hands disarmingly "Hey man, I get it that you don't like what we're discussing, but if we give in to your request, wouldn't that mean we'd have to give into any other request you have about topics? What if we were talking about sex amongst ourselves and that too wasn't acceptable since you go to efforts to avoid that topic as well? I don't think we want to live our lives beholden to your feelings on things, that's for us to decide. Have a good day."

Interesting, by your guidelines, there's quite some limits on expressing oneself to appease people who can easily avoid and skip over a clearly labeled piece of content.

From my perspective, it's as though someone came into a tavern and, fresh ale in hand, overheard a political discussion happening in a corner booth. Perhaps the subject was particularly distasteful to this theoretical tavern goer, and instead of ignoring it or moving to a seat where they can't hear it, they instead march up to said booth and demand these booth talkers cease their discussion immediately, explaining that they come to the tavern to relax, not have these political ideas pop up everywhere they go.

I suspect the people in the booth would be quite bewildered as to why this theoretical person is going to such trouble to involve themselves in ceasing an activity they could so easily avoid.

Could you elaborate on that? If I'm understanding you correctly, you're suggesting it's identity politics to say publicly that a piece of media influenced your political views?

Are there cases where that doesn't apply? for example: "There Will Be Blood made me Anti-oil" or "How Nausica Valley of the Winds made me an Environmentalist", or "Grave of the Fireflys made me Anti-war". Are all of those conceptual titles equally verboten?

In another comment below, I briefly describe the sort of political content the game has in it. It's not something a random leftist is projecting onto it, it's explicitly political content in the game itself, which is what is being discussed.

It's not really any different from discussing the themes or political content of Metal Gear Solid, Disco Elysium, or Planescape: Torment.

If that's not something you're interested, fair enough my friend! But surely it's not an inconvenience for others to discuss it? The title makes it clear what this is, which makes it pretty easy to avoid and scroll on to the next post.

The first part seems to be for people who are unfamiliar with the games. The political analysis begins at 19 minutes.

The games go into:

• Discussion of monopolies, how they are used to exploit, and how they use state force to maintain their position to prevent competition
• The Carrot character is an anarchist in the first game, who infiltrates the weather factory of the second game to document the exploitation of its workers. He then gives the player a quiz about US economics so that you can infiltrate a board of directors, but when he becomes a member of the board himself, becomes a liberal reformist.
• In the third game, the devs put an easter egg only accessible by editing a config file with an obscure code, which adds police branded riot gear to the marching fascist candy soldiers, in a reference to the 1999 Seattle WTO Protests.

The first part seems to be for people who are unfamiliar with the games. The political analysis begins at 19 minutes.

The games go into:

• Discussion of monopolies, how they are used to exploit, and how they use state force to maintain their position to prevent competition
• The Carrot character is an anarchist in the first game, who infiltrates the weather factory of the second game to document the exploitation of its workers. He then gives the player a quiz about US economics so that you can infiltrate a board of directors, but when he becomes a member of the board himself, becomes a liberal reformist.
• In the third game, the devs put an easter egg only accessible by editing a config file with an obscure code, which adds police branded riot gear to the marching fascist candy soldiers, in a reference to the 1999 Seattle WTO Protests, which occurred 3 months before the release of the game.