Primarily0617 @ Primarily0617 @kbin.social

Posts

0

Comments

312

Joined

2 yr. ago

oh my sweet baby did you only just learn that not everything on the internet is meant for realsies?

when i say i don't think you understand irony, i don't mean here specifically

also, even if it weren't, they're a HEATHEN

it's practically in the job description to make you uncomfortable

the meme format is

you are X because [normal, justifiable reason]
i am X because [degenerate reason that only a little freak could provide]
we are not the same

i don't think you understand irony

what the fuck is going on in the comments of that video? The "$AMA59X" bots are doing some of the shoddiest astroturfing I've seen in years

But the giants are the ones who set the culture for everybody else.

Also, a company might still have holdings/shares/whatever in funds that have invested in commercial real estate.

Also also, if too many companies lease, then why would sunk-cost fallacy act as an explanation?

it’s how many people a BUYER wants to put in the building

and that number gets higher if you work to perpetuate a culture that requires people to work in an office

the point of the original post is that artificially fixing a bias in training data post-training is a bad idea because it ends up in weird scenarios like this one

your comment is saying that the original post is dumb and betrays a lack of knowledge because artificially fixing a bias in training data post-training would obviously only result in weird scenarios like this one

i don't know what your aim is here

any AI person training their algorithms on AI generated data is liable to get fired

though this isn't pertinent to the post in question, training AI (and by AI I presume you mean neural networks, since there's a fairly important distinction) on AI-generated data is absolutely a part of machine learning.

some of the most famous neural networks out there are trained on data that they've generated themselves - e.g., AlphaGo Zero

but that is not a fix

congratulations you stumbled upon the reason this is a bad idea all by yourself

all it took was a bit of actually-reading-the-original-post

the orc appears to be a woman, so that would be quite the feat

kind of awkward that this both:

• exists
• is advertised as soon as you click the play button

it's absolutely coconuts that you're currently attempting to die on the hill of a giant "buy now" button not being an advert

also, you do realise that the launcher is an advert? that's its whole reason to exist. your take is essentially "you're dumb because after you've clicked through the adverts, there aren't any adverts"

isn't that just how you make gravy?

They were arrested and jailed.

as a disclaimer, i don't think i really know enough about the situation to comment on it holistically

that said, if a state wants to find a justification to convict somebody, it can find it

i don't think that, in a war between two states, trusting what an instrument of one state says about an instrument of another is justification by itself

I agree that BG3 is a great diversion from the usual. My point is kind of that if you're a purist about this, you're missing out on it, even though on the whole it bucks the trend.

I have the same launcher settings set, so I mean I kind of agree? But you've seen the advert, and that's basically all they want.

I just think it's kind of weird how people react to things once they've filtered their thinking through the hivemind of the internet versus before.

Yeah, you absolutely can, but knowing to do that means that the advert has already delivered its message to you.

Futzing around with the launcher settings seems like more work than just clicking "no" on an advert that pops up.

I mean I guess Divinity never had ads unless you consider the launcher an advert for their other titles, given that that's basically what it's there to do?

If you don't consider anything in launchers to be adverts then I guess you can play BG3, because that's where the advert for the DLC lives?

I really feel like if Larian had only given you the soundtrack and not the cosmetics, and just not called it DLC, that people really wouldn't be so up in arms about it.

Baldur's Gate 3 was probably the best game of this year (?), but it has an advert for the DLC as soon as you launch it

However, it's also probably one of the least-bad "triple A" games of this year when it comes to overall monetisation, that singular DLC of cosmetics and the soundtrack being the only one available

Unfortunately, I think this one is a losing battle