Primarily0617 @ Primarily0617 @kbin.social

Posts

0

Comments

312

Joined

2 yr. ago

why are you the way that you are?

which is 2-state, which is why it's powers of 2

'twas the night before Christmas
When all through the house
Not a creature was stirring
Not even a mouse
Except for a goblin
And that goblin was me
Clad head-toe in lounge-wear
And screeching with glee

It was basically an aeroplane flying with dead pilots before then

aren't we all

if I can't tell that my battery life has been reduced, why do i care? i'm literally oblivious to it

Surely I know when I want my phone's battery replaced, because I'm the one using it?

dumb kid not even telling them to comment as well

sounds like a win-win

if you want more bandwidth you can just use more lasers

they were too well camouflaged so the tank crew couldn't see them and backed over them reversing out of the drive

Create anonymous UUID, store interactions against this in a separate table, ensure PII is removed prior to storing

which is more or less exactly what netflix did - the whole thing's not that hard to find on google

but you need something to distinguish users at least a bit or the data's equivalent to sales figures

you combine that "not-quite-pii" with other independent data sources that have similar "not-quite-pii" and build a complete picture

the treadmill effect comes from active research in this exact area trying to de-anonymise data sets finding new techniques to get around old ones

anonymising data is a treadmill problem

what might work now won't hold up to the de-anonymising techniques of a few years from now

so no, you can't really

you can't "anonymize" data

ask the people outed as lgbt by netflix's anonymized data set

a random blog post isn't an authoritative source on the matter

maybe try again?

selfish and lazy

you're the one who doesn't want to look it up for themselves though...?

burden of proof is on you and offer evidence for your claims

source?

And "the highest price before it’s too expensive and loss of sales cuts into revenue" is higher in a monopoly than a duopoly. Meaning the "highest cost" is higher in a monopoly than a duopoly.

As an addendum, you haven't really mentioned anything past a vague idea of "maximum cost" until now, so I'm not really sure what you mean about repeating yourself. Are you okay, friend?

So "highest cost" isn't set by "what the consumer is able to spend"? So what's it set by?

if that's how you want to define "highest cost", then goods absolutely aren't priced at highest cost in a duopoly

they aren't even priced at highest cost in a monopoly, because "all the money a person has" is just cartoon logic

I don't know what this means