Not true. lemmy.ml only has dumbass word filter so you can't say "b!tch" or "r3tard." but there isn't any content filter about Luigi's manifesto, or deny, defend, depose. Or declaring that you are happy Brian Thompson was killed, or that Trump was almost assassinated. Additionally CEOs addresses, wishes and suggestions that healthcare companies should have their entire corporate structure culled, won't be removed.
You can also discuss Tienanmen Square, or all of the weird key CIA internet keywords that emerged int he 90's.
I "understood" on a basic level what pointers were when i was first learning programing as a 12-13year old. But I never understood HOW to use them, or manipulate them, or what functions you use to interact with them, or how to examine them, or how to declare them, etc etc. And since I was young I never got the opportunity to take an actual programming class that taught any of that throughout high school. By the time I got to college I went with Electrical Engineering instead of computer science and so my journey with pointers ended.
Now I do python and never have to think about pointers.
Yea lack of glasses probably a different reporter. But the fact that it is a different reporter shows that CNN could have accommodated the Iranian Presidents demands if they wanted to, then the fact that they accommodated the al qaeda guy shows it was never about the head scarf or Islam or anything like that.
Can we please PLEASE start linking the actual tweet in the future. You can also screen shot it/copy and paste the content if you want, but PLEASE screenshots of tweets are the worst thing on the internet.
So I think by reading the comments I understand the context here.
A CNN reporter, Amanpour, was going to interview the Iranian President. The president demanded the female wear a head scarf. The CNN reporter declined because she is a strong independent woman or something, so the Iranian president didn't show up. This same reporter then interviewed a former member of ISIS/Al Qaeda, and now suddenly she is wearing a headscarf. However for some reason interviewing this Al Qaeda member while wearing a headscarf is more important then whatever principles she supposedly has?
The implication is that she had no intention of conducting a good faith interview of the Iranian President at all. Is this correct?
If it's not him it seems it would be trivial to prove that, but if any of the information provided to us by law enforcement is true (yea I know big if, but why would a random cop in pennsylvania lie about finding the suspect?) then it's certainly him.
Agreed, but he could have gotten away with it! His trail was cold, the police had nothing. He could have ditched all the evidence and just gone home, sigh.
A better way to do that would be to take some pictures with his phone of the dead CEO before taking off on his bike, and then posting them as verification photos on a 4chan thread or something. But yea this is all just speculation. It's just odd.
I don't understand how this guy planned the assassination, the escape from NYC and then 3days later he sitll has all the evidence linking him to the crime on his person, and he is still on a Greyhound bus instead of chilling at home, or camping in the woods or something, anything else.
It can't just be CEO's. While CEOs are certainly "no-angels" they are the public face of late-stage capitalism. Board Members and "share holders" who often don't even have their name publicly associated with any industry of misery are the ones profiting from the existing misery. You have to get them all.
Random acts of violence never improve things, targeted acts of violence absolutely act as catalysts for change, including on the systemic level. Whether that change is an improvement or not, depends on how much parallel power an organization has.
There never was international law and I doubt there will be as long as independent nation-states exist. The ICC was created to give legitimacy to US Actions and as a propaganda opportunity by trying in the court the losers of WW2. It was never meant to actually uphold fairness or justice.
This is fundamentally true. However it is possible to limit the bandwidth of data the employee can exfiltrate.
Assuming a privileged employee suddenly becomes a bad actor. Private-keys/certs are compromised, any kind of shared password/login is compromised.
In my case I have a legit access to my company's web-certs as well as service account ssh-key's, etc. If I were determined to undermine my company, I could absolutely get access to our HSM-stored software signing keys too. Or more accurately I'd be able to use that key to compile and sign an arbitrary binary at least once.
But I couldn't for example download our entire customer database, I could get a specific record, I could maybe social engineer access to all the records of a specific customer, but there is no way I'd be able to extract all of our customers via an analog loophole or any standard way. The data set is too big.
I also wouldn't be able to download our companies software source code in it's entirety. Obviously I could intelligently pick a few key modules etc, but the whole thing would be impossible.
And this is what you are trying to limit. If you trust your employees (some you have to), you can't stop them from copying the keys to the kingdom, but you can limit the damage that they can do, and also ensure they can't copy ALL the crown jewels.
Article 2, section 2, which is exactly what I was referring to. The constitution is not a long or complex document should I explain the electoral college to you next?
Numerous firms could have netted big commissions from the Harris campaign. Four companies received at least $90 million in payments as of mid-October, including one firm whose cumulative receipts from the Harris campaign approached $300 million.
This is the real purpose of the democratic party, at least the unelected part that controls ballot access in almost all 50 states. They don't really care if dems are elected, let alone the policies of the democratic party, as long as the well connected firms get paid. Fundraising is the point.
Not true. lemmy.ml only has dumbass word filter so you can't say "b!tch" or "r3tard." but there isn't any content filter about Luigi's manifesto, or deny, defend, depose. Or declaring that you are happy Brian Thompson was killed, or that Trump was almost assassinated. Additionally CEOs addresses, wishes and suggestions that healthcare companies should have their entire corporate structure culled, won't be removed.
You can also discuss Tienanmen Square, or all of the weird key CIA internet keywords that emerged int he 90's.