PotatoLibre @ PotatoLibre @feddit.it

Posts

0

Comments

133

Joined

5 mo. ago

Hard to call "critical mind" anyone who compare those two conflicts in such a gross way.

It's also packed with naive commies, it's a palvovian conditioning.

0.5% isn't a landslide at any latitude

True.

But as a "social capital" seeker, I'm keen to see more the typical italian mafia boss. He lives in a concrete hole in a small bs town but he can bend the government to his interests. That's the pure love for the power.

Musk is way simplier. He wants people to say he's good. He's a child.

But he's also an asshole, so people doesn't love him and he doubles down, in his search for appreciation.

I think so.

It might do a difference in some situations, but probably not here.

AOC for example as a lot of power if compared to her wealth, while Musk sucks at politics and needs the money to achive power. At the same time AOC is galaxies away from the power Musk has just because of his money.

Putin for example wants to hide it, but he's not only powerful, before the war was worth 200 billions. I see money and power like interchangeable things.

I don't understand why you care so much, for me money and power get along 🤷

Sure, I took Elmo as a reference, bit I should have said the 1%, or the establishment or whatever.

The 1% needs a basement to stay on. The wider it get, the more stable it will be. Since the piramid it's not getting taller anymore, they're trying to make it wider at the bottom.

I'm 45 and since I was a kid I heard my father telling me his gen was the last getting richer than the one before.

We (westerns), did reach the peak and now every gen will be poorer year after year.

That's why rich people is hoarding wealth like never before. That's why Elmo wants to establish fascism, abolish worker rights and wants the people doing more childs. It doesn't matter for him if we get even poorer, he just wants to make his wealth future proof.

Politicians should be responsible for the people to vote.

An election with 63% of the voters should not allow a full mandate. Of course politicians will never agree to that on either sides, but it's how it should be imo.

This is genius!

Literally any socialistic country turned in a shitty dictatorship. Do you still need further investigations?

The biggest example is China. They opened to capitalism in order to let the greedy comrades survive in their power and what you have know? Chinese are free to earn tons of money, but not to say what they think.

It's the biggest paradox of the world.

In the biggest socialist country capitalism is tollerated more then free speech.

Would be nice, but it just never going to happen.

We've been there already.

If it's not the CIA it will be a coup from some smart ass****e high ranked in the military/party.

Humans are to greedy to live in a socialist peaceful world.

This or eventually give a total amount to the couple and let them decide to split according to their needs (with a minum each partner, maybe).

It's the typical toxic corporate pressure.

Fuck machismo.

Dude can't really hold himself.

Good.

Well, you have a point there.

Narcissism is the main problem with him, K made it worse.

Got banned today because I don't think socialism would work in 2025 🤷.

I understand people can "Think different", but a cirkle jerk of US socialists in 2025 sounds like a strabic unicorn with three legs and two horns.