PopMyCop @ PopMyCop @iusearchlinux.fyi

Posts

1

Comments

148

Joined

2 yr. ago

Same here. We've got some neat studies showing that serif fonts are read more quickly, which I would think is a big boon.

You must deliver some bomber flowers. Those scrubs dvds were expensive.

Pony Express

Which was a commercial failure, if anyone is curious. The whole shebang lasted less than two years. Started in 1860, bankrupt in 1861, thanks to the telegraph's stretch across America.

I wonder if Carlson is fully aware of how deep the hole is that he is about to crawl into. He likely already is a full russian stooge, but if not, he's about to find out just how tyrannical despots can be when you're in their power. Imagine the open and implied threats to his life and his family as they walk him through exactly what to say. Imagine how they dissuade him when he suggests certain questions that he wants to ask. If he strays from the exact script? Somebody get a picture of him when he returns to the states, and if it's within a week of the interview, see how many bruises, cuts, limps, or other signs of 'treatment' there are.

They sign up for it because the advertising is insidious. My family member signed up for it because it used the name of a well-known doctor's group in the area. Sure, they have a deal with said doctor's group, but it is no better than having the entire field available that medicare would have given.

Aye, anecdotally, there was a school near my childhood home, other side of the street and about .8 miles away. The line of cars used to be about halfway to my house. Now, when I visit family, I see it stretching past my house and it at least stretches a full mile in length now. It's nuts.

It's not quite as mandatory as it can get. The FCC has made rumbles about actually kicking carriers off the networks if they don't adhere to the shaken/stirred protocols, but never seems to get around to actually doing it.

The best explanation (ever) for a sovereign citizen is found in a legal opinion by a Canadian judge. He spends about 176 pages delineating their beliefs, origins, and manner of interacting with the legal system.

https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/doc/2012/2012abqb571/2012abqb571.html

It reminds me of the welded-in-a-barn APC that the cartels in mexico have.

I mean, they are better than dwarves at basketball.

Deever: The bifurcation of the urine stream as it exits the male urethra.

Let me upset you further. Dwarves are just short humans, elves are just skinny humans, and orcs are just green humans. Halflings are human children, and gnomes are mischievous human children. We don't talk about the aarakocra.

Oh. Oh, you poor innocent soul. Sometimes I wish for the days of fancy and wonder to come back to me. You keep thinking the best thoughts!

I've had it happen to the point where they're leaning on the car's window, and I'm desperately holding in the urge to let my foot off the brake pedal.

Have you tried LibRedirect? It works for quite a bit more than just youtube. I personally love it for the fandom mirrors.

61%, according to actuaries. It's the same reason that this law isn't all that great in making insurance companies the new gatekeeper for ownership: permit holders are among the lowest risk for firearm incidents. People who have guns and who won't be paying for this insurance are the real actuarial, financial risk. The suicidal and the homicidal will be nearly excluded from the policy risks because they won't be buying the policy. The title saying "gun owners" is incorrect, because this only applies to people who "wear or carry." Thus, the insurance cost will be low.

From driving_crooner's link: https://www.theactuarymagazine.org/firearm-risk/

As far as I'm aware (and I'm in a super gun happy place), it's nearly universal that the local law enforcement agency signs off on most things like this. The tax stamps for suppressors/machine guns/explosives and the carry permit all go to them. Whether your area is a 'shall issue' or a 'may issue' is where you have to dig to find out.

It will be low. Super low. $300k is pocket change when the incidence for gun carriers to use them is extremely low. It's why we can constantly mock the tacti-cool warriors for thinking they need a gun on them at all times. Plus, the insurance company has way more flexibility in proving their client was not at fault in the incident compared to the shenanigans they have to pull now for car wrecks.

There are places that mandate dog insurance if the dog has been aggressive in the past. It's at least a partial step in the right direction.

See, that one doesn't really seem to have the same impact. When I hear the name rafael, I think famous artist, or shelled low-level crime-fighter. Sounds great, doesn't it?