Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)PO
Posts
1
Comments
700
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Their profile was banned last time I looked about a year ago. My profile I deleted because it was permanently tainted by that asshole spamming my talk page.

    I remember posting about it on Reddit back when it happened a few years ago, and everyone in the comments told me how they've had similar experiences. Really just made me weary about trusting Wikipedia. I mean sure, if they get the date of a movie wrong that's fine, but as for more serious topics, I just can't really trust it.

    Even sources can be garbage. I've seen plenty of blog spam cited as sources, which means nothing.

  • Nah.

    I edited a page for a new OS update that was coming out. The page was FULL of misinformation, and I cleaned it up, linked official documentation as sources, etc.

    My edits were reverted by some butt hurt guy who originally wrote the page full of misinformation, 0 sources, and broken English.

    I reverted back to mine.

    He reverted back to his.

    He spammed my profile page calling me names, and then reported me to Wiki admins. I was told not to revert changes or I would be perma-banned. I explained how the original page was broken English, misinformation, and 0 sources were cited. They straight up told me they did NOT care.

    Stopped editing wiki pages, and stopped trusting them. They didn't care about factual information. They just wanted to enforce their reverting rule.

  • Ya, because there's not enough to go around.

    How doesn't that make sense?

    It's literally the same concept of stores only allowing 1 item to be purchased, to prevent someone from coming in and buying all of them. Limit 1 per customer.

  • Exactly. It's rare and valuable. So a single person shouldn't be allowed to own 12 houses and price gouge them.

    Everyone should be allowed 1. If you have a reason to need a second one, you should have to be approved and provide a really good reason.

    But nah. Let's let one person own 12 because they were there first.

  • Ya. I live in Canada, and I've never felt the need to own a gun. We have a TON of hunting guns here, but I think the fact we don't allow open carry, changes the thought process of gun owners here, and we don't see them as weapons to point at other people. They are more so seen as a tool for a hobby, like a fishing rod is used for fishing.

    And honestly, if you avoid Toronto, violence in general is really low. Toronto is just.. special.

  • There was a study published from data from the last like.. 10 years, I believe, that show that people with guns are more likely to run away, and people WITHOUT guns, are more likely to jump in and try to stop the shooter.

    So ya. These good guys with guns are just pussies that never actually use them for good.

  • I tried it, but then realized I couldn't even view my photos I took with my Nexus phone at the time. No Google photos app, and the web browser just took me to a page that said my phone isn't supported.

    YouTube was also only supported via a third party app, and was missing pretty much every feature.

    As soon as I realized I would struggle to do the most basic tasks, I bailed.

  • Google Nexus (and now Pixel) has always allowed you to double tap the power button to open the camera, and then use the volume buttons to take the photo. Or you can use the volume buttons to zoom in and out.

    Isn't this the same? Dedicated buttons that launch the camera and take photos?

  • Do you have any idea how excited I was for the GTA trilogy remake? I've been waiting for so long. Only to be slapped in the face.

    The worst part is that I know rockstar will never attempt to remake them again. I'll never get that San Andreas remaster.

  • Creators can see how much they make from premium subscribers vs ad views. They do make more from people who pay for premium.

    Why do you say they don't? Like I'm curious where you got that from, when it's blatantly wrong?