PolandIsAStateOfMind @ PolandIsAStateOfMind @lemmygrad.ml

Posts

32

Comments

1,339

Joined

3 yr. ago

If you think of it, it's pretty impressive how liberals always manage, without even a sliver of understanding, recognize which side is objectively reactionary and follow it.

Sounds awfully similar to polish messianism. Costed us millions of lives too.

the only explanation

It was mentioned now and then, but no one seem to seriously believe this, if they were to the point of "march to Moscow" they might instead do much more significant damage in concert with the UA offensive just now, which they didn't.

they were able to sweep the Whites aside with relative ease.

In Petersburg at first yeah. But the civil war was incredibly hard. If whites actually managed to coordinate even with themselves, not to mention with intervents, they would probably won. Hell, the worst moment in war was when Yudenich managed to somewhat coordinate with Kolchak, and even then Kolchak fucked it up by being stuck up imperialist pig.

I once read a funny article where some Japanese actually checked out in practice those lib "boycot China", they found out volunteer for that and after taking everything made in China out he was just sitting in nearly empty home. They finished the article with conclusion that in Japan you couldn't even die in peace without China because nearly all coffins are made there.

dared to compare this to February 1917.

More like september 1917 (august old style)

Not even that, he suggest that Russian army resistance is negligible so the fortifications are basically only obstacle for AFU.

I don't even know if that's more insulting to Russians or Ukrainians.

Thanks.

they aren’t satisfied getting a space for themselves until they can be sure their ‘enemy’ also has no space for themselves.

They know that deplatforming works. Even the westolefto, despite all their freezepeach nonsense.

Lmao every time the liberal reality bend reaches critical values this guy is there on a spearhead:

I mean, from what i see Nietzsche key to popularity was precisely the fact he's understandable, because he mostly just rambled, but laymen at least can tell what he meant.

Try this one.

Cucumber season. A bit too early this year i guess.

Yeah, but seriously what's even the point of such wisdom, especially when it can led people into things like subjective idealism. Or maybe it's because idealists needs to reach insane levels of abstraction to even explain their idiotic ideas.

Blairism is another name for the "Third Way" a sharp turn into neoliberalism made by most european socialdemocratic parties in the 90's in which they remain ever since, the most significant leaders of it were Tony Blair and Gerhard Schroeder and it got great push from Bill Clinton.

It's not only an internet, reading philosphy in general i noticed it's awfully filled with jargon. And it tend to use it in worst possible manner.

Most of them will probably get back.

They aren't even shy about it (post about "tankies"):

Yes, the Wall Street Journal is puke, but nobody lies 100% of the time. That’s why you need to learn how to read critically.

The point we post explicitly liberal sources is to make liberals think even for just a second. Turns out, it's still not enough.

And what’s up with all of the repetitive definitions and attempts to accuse you of being logically fallacious?

It's an old trolling technique, but this guy apparently didn't even understand how it's done.