PoisonedPrisonPanda @ PoisonedPrisonPanda @discuss.tchncs.de

Posts

1

Comments

350

Joined

2 yr. ago

Very well written. Makes me wanna try out void again (although I am very fine with debian)

Oh boy. Weve all been there.

Stay hydrated.

Linking in trillium notes is PITA.

How do you work efficiently? Trillium is much more friction I felt when testing it out.

Void linux is also very nice for the same case

The term you are searching for is enshittification. :)

That looks great. Like an easy temporary exchange share.

Thanks.

Can you point me to resources for that?

i will probably go the seafile route, as it offers rclone compatibility. But I like to tinker with "bare metal" stuff.

Im amazed by peoples creativity.

I havent thought until now that such things like translations can be misused for hate speech.

Genuine question:

Do you host your content on other platforms (like lbry/odysee) as well?

Thats often the case with AI critical stories.

Most of the time ML is faulted for a problem its root lays way deeper.

Awkward boner

I have a Mi 9 t pro. Never experienced anything like that.

While I do have hardened my settings, debloat with adb etc. privacy whise and use the EU MIUI rom.

Do you rememher said websites?

Did you read the article?

I for sure didnt.

Thanks for highlighting that.

I was carried away by having the discussions at my university with my peers in mind.

Copying+pasting the output of chatGPT without ever looking at it, or even using a language tool to publish thoughts that were never in your head to begin with, is the actual concern

Nevertheless I dont understand why this is a concern.

The scientific standards existed decades if not already at least a century.

Those discussions are putting chatgpt in a bad light. However the fact that our scientific system was eroded and made a mockery of before the introduction of chatgpt is not highlighted.

There are still plagiarizations around and nobody cares. Mostly because of political sensitivity.

However science has failed to repel "bad actors" (intentional or unintentional) from the scene.

I dont know when. And why. But publisher have for sure something to do with it.

Thats another point. Fair enough.

But still I dont think that science will stall just because of chatgpt.

Journalism? Will for sure. But scientific publications have a systemic problem (like publisher-polism, pubscores etc) And outsourcing writing work to chargpt is - in my opinion - non of them.

I think of it as in another anology.

Compare a screwdriver with a power tool.

Does the convenient solution hinder you from building your house simply because you cant "feel" the strength of the wood while turning the screw in?

i doubt.

The things you mentioned are coming into play when people think of AI as a god mode. As a user you are solely responsible for how to use a tool. If the user overestimates the power of the tool or use it for the wrong things. Its the users fault.

The scientist is still a scientist. Which is the author of the paper. Not gpt because it writes filler text or puts the scientists thoughts into sentences.

The context is still at the scientists plate. If the scientist does a poorly job at reviewing the gpts output. Gpt cant be faulted.

i think there is a step in between like red bull or something.

But you do you.

For the sake of an survey you are right.

But practically this shows how easy people are fooled nowadays, and it will only get worse in the future.

whistles

Always look on the bright side of life....

I dont need it to be beyond that? It does what I told it. And if I am creative enough to get my preferred output its great. I have still to decide if Ill use it.

Its a tool which can be used by people and helps with work.

I think it's an important part of the process of doing science, no matter which field. And one gets better at it with training

Sorry but this expression is probably a similar one when paper writting shifted to digital only format or when the typewriter was introduced.

Boomer tell me the same with printed paper. "oNlY whEn ItS PriNtED yOu cAn rEaD pRoberly"

Thats bullshit its just fear of the something new and convenience of routine.

Nothing personal against you. I welcome any tool that helps me.

The whole system should get ready for the 21st century.

Most of the scientists arent great writers. It does not make sense to still force them to be a good writer.

Let be fishes be good at swimming instead of climbing trees.

In a modern world where basically EVERYTHING is specialized and no generalist is alive anymore we should make use of language tools.

Hell Chatgpt writes an introduction which is fun to read instead or my overcomplicated bullshit that I would have brought up

Edit: the comment was not related to the OP but to a general chatgpt discussion.