PixelPilgrim @ PixelPilgrim @lemmings.world

Posts

22

Comments

176

Joined

5 mo. ago

God I hate that. Can't say "hey this things broken" without it being a serious issue like damn trying to address an issue

I don't think it will work for Firefox. I'll have to convert it down the line when I got most of the features knocked out

It's a browser extension for chromium based browsers like brave.

https://github.com/solidheron/peertube_recomendation_algorythm

I tried to make the alfo as simple as possible. It matches the words of the videos descriptions title and tags to other other videos words and ranks them via cosine similarity (de-ranks then via if the video has been seen before)

I should add a blacklist for keywords because I'm kinda sick of all the Linux content and there's a lot of Linux content on peertube

I use duct tape to cover bright lights

I'm lost

Founding fathers would be amazed at the lack of bloodshed their system has made and would probably be like amazed at all the propaganda

Porn

just peertube recommendation algorithm browser extension. Working pretty well and ik discovering channels that make/reupload well produced content

of cource i forget to log in to this account after posting. but so far Im building it to be more like a browser extension that collects your watch history and video meta data peertube video via api and locally suggests what video to watch next

of okay. i guess if i get to the point where aggregating data from multiple users then yeah ill look into publishing the data somehow, most of the data will be pulled from peertube instances

im thinking of something more like a browser extension that modifies webpage with recommendations, so far its 1 person (myself) then build up from there. i dont think peertube instance would have to be involved outside of just giving the meta data for local videos

yeah i hope people build on my work and improve it since i doubt ill even have this project working anytime soon.

i have hard time concieving of p2p system for this. is it like heres what this person likes so do "X"

Yeah the merit of a stance is different than someone's ability to argue. They're different concepts.

So all your saying is don't engage with bots (even though it's fine because bots can get you information quickly), and that you can't ignore negative people online.

Lol so you agree with this post I made just not the other

Lol my argument automatically has no merit without you hearing any of it. That's like bigotry or something.

I guess Ben Shapiro argues with people that aren't media trained to make his stance look better, do you want me to say people Ben Shapiro argues make some awesome argument all the time without exception?

I'll teach you that it's not on me to make your arguments, get your evidence. I just put it on myself to communicate my arguments and poke holes in other people's arguments

Ikr, I like pissing people off then making much of them for not being able to defend their position. I think it's good for engagement

I generally say bullet points are good ideals, but there's a much bigger issue with mental health.

There are certain people in lemmy that need to learn what "you have no enemies" and "I'm gonna do my own thing" means. It's fine people are different live on earth is very diverse

Atheist

Lol 13 books on the same topic 😎 13 different Wikipedia 🤮

It's fine if people fit people to have different views/take on a subject.