Constantine. Allegedly had a vision/dream where he was told to put either a chi-rho or tau-rho symbol on his shields ahead of the Battle of the Milvian Bridge, and after victory he converted, with the rest of the Roman Empire following his lead.
That's fair. Without getting too in the weeds on the issue, apparently the video is authentic and it's somethingIsraelis do as well, so isn't really telling about either side of the conflict except to note that extremists will use children to push their views anywhere.
If you're going to make that claim, perhaps cite to a source isn't run by former Israeli intelligence that creates a lot of propaganda and has been doing so for decades.
They're separate thoughts that are inconveniently in the same paragraph.
There's nothing wrong with defense making this argument, any competent attorney would do the same.
This case generally should be subject to prosecution because the raid is so blatantly corrupt.
City prosecutors can absolutely sue city officials though in cases like this, they normally get a special prosecutor or someone from another jurisdiction (like the county or state) to avoid the conflict like you said. This records act has nothing to do with criminal prosecution, it's about public disclosure. A prosecutor can just get a warrant. This is happening because the news organization is requesting the messages.
That law doesn't mean that every public officer's phone is an open book, it means that anything a public officer does in their public capacity on a private device is still subject to normal public records disclosures. You don't get the entire phone, you get the public records (the relevant messages).
My guess, though I don't know, is that the news organization has to somehow establish to some degree of confidence that there are public records on the personal phone, which I'm guessing they'll be able to do.
Appeasement after the assassination of Lincoln due to Johnson's soft stance on Confederates. Basically moderates shit the bed and rather than wipe out the ideology, they let it fester and become "heritage."
Not surprised the attorney is making these moves, it'd be malpractice not to make the argument. The city's prosecutor (or county or state) should have opened a criminal investigation into everyone involved and obtained search warrants.
It's her voice and she's the client. The lawyers can't file without her okaying it. She's also a pretty solid businessperson, she took on Disney and won.
For sure. What I like to ask people who (very understandably) seek harsh or cruel punishment in these cases is "Will it help? Or will it just make you feel better and produce a better criminal?"
Even with the most generous reading of the amendment, the word "regulated" is literally in there.