Pips @ Pips @lemmy.sdf.org

Posts

43

Comments

297

Joined

2 yr. ago

Without the textbook.

None of those are traditional phone services, they're all internet based so regulated differently. I agree they should be regulated as telephone utilities but right now they're not.

A hypothesis is "I think x is true" or "x will happen if I do y." It is a conclusory statement based on existing knowledge that then has to be proven and is one of the first things you learn to do in science. Asking "what happened to x" or "what is x" is not a hypothesis, it's an open-ended inquiry. While both are useful, the hypothesis is specifically part of the scientific method. You're proving or disproving smaller conclusions to answer a broader open-ended inquiry.

Yeah, there's nothing in the rulebook that says supply has to meet demand for nonessentials like fucking mezcal. I like mezcal but it's not a requirement.

My old one? It's a good question and I have actually thought about it. I have a lot of inanity on there but some (I think) decent replies to people trying to be "reasonable" fascists, racists, misogynists, etc. if that makes sense. I'll admit I mostly posted news articles I thought were interesting, though I would regularly participate in the discussions for those articles, but those articles frequently got a lot of traffic. So I guess there's two problems with nuking the account:

(1) If I delete all my comments, you end up in some cases with what looks like someone deleting their response to a bad actor, leaving that bad actor not only unchallenged, but looking like they "won" the argument, and

(2) If I delete all my posts, I remove from public view the comments of (at this point) likely tens of thousands of people, if not more given how many high karma and high participation posts I submitted, many of whom might not have wanted me to do so.

I have so many of both that it'd be a massive pain to go through and selectively delete stuff. Easier to just leave the account be and never use it again. Deleting the account just means it's anonymized, which can also invite bad faith.

It is, there's a lot of highly specific knowledge on Reddit. It's still a resource.

Did they? I had one of the top non-porn accounts actually run by a person (most high karma accounts use bots, I didn't out of ironic laziness) and I haven't posted or commented since whenever Day 0 was for rif is fun. I've been back a couple times for very specific things but not logged in or participating in any active way. Of course, I'm just one (high karma) data point, but I really don't think I'm unique in this. I also have no real desire to contribute to Reddit again in the future. Getting off of it has been pretty nice.

Look, it's not that people aren't still posting, the site obviously still has content, but it really is just "content." The quality of discussion I've seen has gone down pretty steep. Modding appears to be almost nonexistent in big subs or very agenda-driven otherwise. I think a lot of contributors who treated Reddit like old school forums have left and it's slowly turning into a weird combo of Facebook and 4chan if that makes sense. If that's what the userbase wants, go for it, I guess. But that's not my jam.

Is that a thing outside of New York?

You start maxing out at 47 years.

He wasn't accused of being the brightest bulb.

I got This is the Police a while back but finally installed it. Surprisingly engaging given how it forces you to be a corrupt and shitty cop to survive. Feels like copaganda, but thankfully I can separate fiction from reality.

Really hope those are permanent homes and there aren't any that get returned.

I think that's just Ray Romano.

Hero.

A lot of people cancel after watching the series. Releasing over several weeks allows for a continual revenue stream over those weeks. For people who like bingeing, the show is pretty much always up in full at the end of its run.

Okay and what's wrong with seeking engagement with whatever they're making (which every person who makes anything does) and trying to ensure continued subscription, which makes sense given the business? I agree that streaming has generally become ridiculous and diluted, but there's nothing inherently wrong with wanting people to watch stuff and attempting to ensure a steady revenue stream to do it.

Israel has nukes and is run by nutjobs. They won't use nukes in Gaza, it's too close to Israeli cities. But there's no telling what they'll do the further away a conflict gets.

Well, no, because the Fed can't do any of those things.

Congress could dissolve the Court on Tuesday if they wanted to. Impeach and removal. Not every justice has behaved egregiously enough to merit it, but it's a political decision anyway.

Just another turning of the Wheel every time you boot it up.

"I have won again, Lews Therin. Flicker."