Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)PI
Posts
0
Comments
455
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Light trucks is kinda a crazy category. It's lighter vehicles that

    (1) Designed primarily for purposes of transportation of property or is a derivation of such a vehicle, or (2) Designed primarily for transportation of persons and has a capacity of more than 12 persons, or (3) Available with special features enabling off-street or off-highway operation and use

    Vans, minivans, SUVs, and crossovers are mostly categorized as light trucks. Most vehicles on the road are light trucks; they outsell cars right now 3 to 1

  • Three year olds aren't all that smart, but they learn in a way that ChatGTP 3 and ChatGPT 4 don't.

    A 3 year old will become a 30 year old eventually, but ChatGPT 3 just kinda stays ChatGPT3 forever. LLMs can be trained offline, but we don't really know if that converges to some theoretical optimum at some point and how far away from the best possible LLM we are.

  • Exactly.

    AI, as a term, was coined in the mid-50s by a computer scientist, John McCarthy. Yes, that John McCarthy, the one who invented LISP and helped develop Algol 60.

    It's been a marketing buzzword for generations, born out of the initial optimism that AI tasks would end up being pretty easy to figure out. AI has primarily referred to narrow AI for decades and decades.

  • The US and Jordan have been allies for decades, and the US has military bases in allies around the world.

    This particular base is located near Syria, so it might be because of the Syrian civil war.

    Also, fun fact - the king of Jordan appeared as an extra on American TV. Specifically, on Star Trek Voyager.

  • The US House banned abortion federally in the last year? The US House is about to do away with chevron deference?

    This is a Republican House member complaining that their last session has mostly been embarrassing. The highest profile thing they've done is had a hard time keeping a speaker.

    And aren't court appointments a senate thing?

  • Yeah, projects also exist in the real world and practical considerations matter.

    The legacy C/C++ code base might slowly and strategically have components refactored into rust, or you might leave it.

    The C/C++ team might be interested in trying Rust, but have to code urgent projects in C/C++.

    In the same way that if you have a perfectly good felling axe and someone just invented the chain saw, you're better off felling that tree with your axe than going into town, buying a chainsaw and figuring out how to use it. The axe isn't really the right tool for the job anymore, but it still works.

  • C is not how a computer truly works.

    If you want to know how computers work, learn assembly and circuit design. You can learn C without ever thinking about registers, register allocation, the program counter, etc.

    Although you can learn assembly without ever learning about e.g. branch prediction. There's tons of levels of abstraction in computers, and many of the lower level ones try to pretend you've still got a computer from the 80s even though CPUs are a lot more complex than they used to be.

    As an aside, I've anecdotally heard of some schools teaching Rust instead of C as a systems language in courses. Rust has a different model than C, but will still teach you about static memory vs the stack vs the heap, pointers, etc.

    Honestly, if I had to write some systems software, I'd be way more confident in any Rust code I wrote than C/C++ code. Nasal demons scare me.

  • Oh, yeah.

    If your point is that ICE car batteries have problems in the cold, so cold batteries is a problem for everyone and worse for ICE cars, that's fair.

    If your point is that ICE car batteries suck therefore EVs suck, that's not really valid logic.

  • Right tool for the job, sure, but that evolves over time.

    Like, years back carpenters didn't have access to table saws that didn't have safety features that prevent you from cutting off your fingers by stopping the blade as soon as it touches them. Now we do. Are old table saws still the "right tool for the job", or are they just a dangerous version of a modern tool that results in needless accidents?

    Is C still the right tool for the job in places where Rust is a good option?

  • Fixing the two party system in the house can be done piecemeal by states, because states run their own house elections.

    Fixing the two party system in the presidency requires either an amendment or an interstate pact.

    Because what the constitution says is that if no single candidate gets a majority in the electoral college's FPTP election, then the president is whichever candidate the US house prefers.

  • There would have been a pretty big difference between Ford inditing Nixon after Watergate, and Nixon running again with the promise of inditing political rivals in retribution.

    It's good to hold politicians accountable for their actual crimes, and bad to have a politically motivated kangaroo court.

  • 'Worse is better' came from a Common Lisp guy from MIT back in 1991, describing the success of C and UNIX.

    It's really not just that Rust is new and C is old. Compare Rust with Go, for example. Go is a fairly modern example of a 'worse is better' language.

    Back in 1970s when C was invented, Lisp had been around for over a decade. C came out the same year as smalltalk, a year before ML, and 3 years before Scheme.

    Rust is a very modern language, yes. There's no way we could have had it in the 70s; many of its language features hadn't been invented yet. But it very much depends on MIT style research languages for its basis.

  • and probably using the sweetest varieties they can find.

    It's probably a mix of using sweet varieties, picking at peak ripeness and quickly juicing them without much transportation.

    Think of the difference in if you made tomato juice with a standard supermarket tomato vs a local in-season farmstand tomato.

    Either way, we should all be watering it down.

    Honestly, juice just isn't anywhere near as healthy as whole fruit.

    You can water it down if you want, but either way it should be a fairly rare treat.

  • Some of the best drinks I've ever had are pure fresh-squeezed juice.

    For example: pomegranate juice pressed by a street vendor? Amazing. Apples from the tree in my mom's yard? Incredible when juiced. Freshly squeezed orange juice? Sign me up.

    Relatively few fruits make a juice that's not good straight. Cranberry comes to mind as being too bitter. Lemon is a bit too acidic for most.

    Wyman's 100% blueberry juice is 20g sugar per 250ml. Mott's apple juice is 28g for 8 oz/240ml. So blueberry juice is about 2/3 the sugar of apple juice. It's still plenty sweet.

    You don't water blueberry juice down because it's not sweet enough. You water it down because 8oz of Mott's apple juice is $1.30 at Walmart, and 8oz of wymans' blueberry juice is $7.30. Blends use apple juice because it's cheap and mild, so you can layer other flavors on top.

    Juice isn't bad for you because of the extra apple sugar. It's bad because you removed all the fiber. Fiber promotes sateity.