Children do not need $200, simple truth, especially not $200 that's by all accounts not really theirs. It's time for OP to give a white lie that they tracked down the original owner and buy Timmy & Co. some ice cream cones and call it a day
No clue where your downvote is from but there isn't a single cop who wouldn't pocked $200 lol. Don't give it to the kid though, OP. Take the group out for ice cream or something and pay yourself for your time spent cleaning the park.
Why is the text clearly put on top of the original image?? Did Kelly have this thought later and want to make sure she got credit for it but not go through the process of making a new tweet?
FWIW the Panopticon has been used metaphorically before.
From Wikipedia (I'd recommend reading the whole Criticisms and use as Metaphor section):
In the mid-1970s, the panopticon was brought to the wider attention by the French psychoanalyst Jacques-Alain Miller and the French philosopher Michel Foucault.[30] In 1975, Foucault used the panopticon as metaphor for the modern disciplinary society in Discipline and Punish. He argued that the disciplinary society had emerged in the 18th century and that discipline are techniques for assuring the ordering of human complexities, with the ultimate aim of docility and utility in the system.[31] Foucault first came across the panopticon architecture when he studied the origins of clinical medicine and hospital architecture in the second half of the 18th century. He argued that discipline had replaced the pre-modern society of kings, and that the panopticon should not be understood as a building, but as a mechanism of power and a diagram of political technology
A concept for a prison model where the cells are arranged circling a central watchtower. No one misbehaves because the tower could be watching you at any time
Wasn't this always known? Musk's defense when he was sued for this in the 24 pres election was that it specifically wasn't a lottery system and that the winner isn't random but is vetted and picked before announcement, which is evidently legal.
In court Monday, Musk’s lawyers acknowledged that the super PAC isn’t picking winners “by chance.”
“There is no prize to be won,” Musk lawyer Chris Gober said, and the winners “are not chosen by chance.” Therefore, it is not a lottery, Gober argued.
Instead, Gober said the so-called “prize” is actually compensation for serving as a spokesperson for the super PAC – and the recipients of the $1 million “are selected based on their suitability to serve as spokesperson for America PAC.” They “earn” the million dollars as payment for their work.
Make an acct on public wifi and then always browse with a VPN on when logged in at home/whatever network you were originally banned on. It's worked for me for a few years now
Hegseth? Davidson? Who are you referring to?