![PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]](https://lemmy.sdf.org/pictrs/image/8802b84c-2dec-4419-886d-b9701e346d76.png?format=webp&thumbnail=128)
calculate the transmission coefficient
Me trying to hang out with literally anyone including people I've known my entire life
Removed
Are you a good big brother?
Jump
I try to be, but I'm probably not close enough to my siblings (or anyone for that matter). I just don't want them to get sucked into the miserable void of despair that is my personal life.
Okay, you first /s
Quantum computing becoming practical for ordinary people.
If my employer forces me to use that specific software, then I care. Thankfully I'm unemployed.
A deep neural adaptive PID controller would be a bit overkill for a simple robot arm, but for say a flexible-link robot arm it could prove useful. They can also work as part of the controller for systems governed by partial differential equations, like in fluid dynamics. They're also great for system identification, the results of which might indicate that the ultimate controller should be some "boring" algorithm.
Since I don't feel like arguing
I'll try to keep this short then.
How will these reasonable AI tools emerge out of this under capitalism?
How does any technology ever see use outside of oppressive structures? By understanding it and putting to work on liberatory goals.
I think that crucial to working with AI is that, as it stands, the need for expensive hardware to train it makes it currently a centralizing technology. However, there are things we can do to combat that. For example, the AI Horde offers distributed computing for AI applications.
And how is it not all still just theft with extra steps that is imoral to use?
We gotta find datasets that are ethically collected. As a practitioner, that means not using data for training unless you are certain it wasn't stolen. To be completely honest, I am quite skeptical of the ethics of the datasets that the popular AI products were trained on. Hence why I refuse to use those products.
Personally, I'm a lot more interested in the applications to robotics and industrial automation than generating anime tiddies and building chat bots. Like I'm not looking to convince you that these tools are "intelligent", merely useful. In a similar vein, PID controllers are not "smart" at all, but they are the backbone of industrial automation. (Actually, a proven use for "AI" algorithms is to make an adaptive PID controller so that's it can respond to changes in the plant over time.)
I'm not sure, but I don't have trouble carrying it. It's so big because sometimes I have to bring in projects and/or test equipment.
When not in school:
- Phone with wallet case
- Keys
- Wireless headphones
When in school: all the above plus:
- Yorepek 50L backpack (everything else goes in here)
- Laptop (notes, actual work) (Debian w/ KDE Plasma)
- Laptop charger
- Grandma's laptop from 15 years ago that runs like dog shit (backup, also Debian, can still access my repos and load web pages, decoy if robbed)
- Tablet (books)
- Voltmeter (yes all the time)
- Blank computer paper and pencils (derivations)
- Guitar picks (Dunlop Gator Grip 2.0mm; for playing death metal, but also makes for a great tool)
Wireless headphones get extra priority because they allow me to control what I hear. For example, instead of getting sensory overload (I'm autistic) at the supermarket, I can replace it with death metal, which is better for some reason.
a good flashlight
Legitimately read that as a good fleshlight at first. Fucking hell I'm so immature lmao.
More on topic, I always tell myself "I'm going to start carrying a flashlight", but I always leave it somewhere. So I just roll with the flashlight on my phone.
Just because you're personally tired of hearing about it doesn't mean it's wrong
Disagree. The technology will never yield AGI as all it does is remix a huge field of data without even knowing what that data functionally says.
We definitely don't need AGI for AI technologies to be useful. AI, particularly reinforcement learning, is great for teaching robots to do complex tasks for example. LLMs have shocking ability relative to other approaches (if limited compared to humans) to generalize to "nearby but different, enough" tasks. And once they're trained (and possibly quantized), they (LLMs and reinforcement learning policies) don't require that much more power to implement compared to traditional algorithms. So IMO, the question should be "is it worthwhile to spend the energy to train X thing?" Unfortunately, the capitalists have been the ones answering that question because they can do so at our expense.
For a person without access to big computing resources (me lol), there's also the fact that transfer learning is possible for both LLMs and reinforcement learning. Easiest way to explain transfer learning is this: imagine that I want to learn Engineering, Physics, Chemistry, and Computer Science. What should I learn first so that each subject is easy for me to pick up? My answer would be Math. So in AI speak, if we spend a ton of energy to train an AI to do math and then fine-tune agents to do Physics, Engineering, etc., we can avoid training all the agents from scratch. Fine-tuning can typically be done on "normal" computers with FOSS tools.
all it does is remix a huge field of data without even knowing what that data functionally says.
IMO that can be an incredibly useful approach for solving problems whose dynamics are too complex to reasonably model, with the understanding that the obtained solution is a crude approximation to the underlying dynamics.
IMO I'm waiting for the bubble to burst so that AI can be just another tool in my engineering toolkit instead of the capitalists' newest plaything.
Sorry about the essay, but I really think that AI tools have a huge potential to make life better for us all, but obviously a much greater potential for capitalists to destroy us all so long as we don't understand these tools and use them against the powerful.
End of Millennial or first of Gen-Z, although I feel a lot more like Gen-Z.
To all the fucking Biden shitlibs:
Do not complain to me when I do not like what you offer – what you offer is the shit of the Earth, and your party being one of capitalism doesn’t care for the Earth either.
I live in an area that got "smoked" during the Canadian wildfires last July. I found out by reading about it on Lemmy. Only then did I look out the window and realize that it wasn't sunset. I'm such a shut-in that I found out about the event I was in the middle of by reading about it on the internet.
Back on Rddit, I actually managed to connect with a few Rdditors (under a different username tho) through the /r/BedroomBands sub. Looks like it's still active. As far as I'm aware, we don't have anything like that on Lemmy yet.
From my experience in music, drummers are always in demand, especially if you can record your kit, even badly; real kit with sample replacement always beats an electric kit, which itself beats programmed drums. (And programming drums from scratch is so boring, speaking from experience.) So I think you'll find people very quickly if you mention it.
As far as my music chops go, I play guitar and bass, mainly metal, but I'm really more of a producer. Unfortunately, I had to stop taking clients from R*ddit because I had to focus on school. Now I'm living with my grandmother and parents so I can't really do music stuff without headphones, so I'm kinda out of commission for a while.
ps - I'm pretty socially anxious and autistic, so making friends takes me extra effort and time.
Me too. It took me months to build up the courage to make my first post. But it was one of the best things I ever did, and I miss that part of my life dearly.
Yes. Can't find work so I definitely can't afford to move out. I moved out briefly during college and while it was unsustainable, I was so happy nonetheless.
I think this is quantum mechanics. Ψ(x) is the wave function of some quantum object (like an electron) as a function of (1 dimensional) space, U(x) is the potential as a function of space. Ψ(x) is a generalization of the state of a particle (a vector in a real space) for quantum mechanics (to a complex function). The squared magnitude of Ψ(x) can be interpreted (with suitable normalization) as a probability that the object will be measured to be located at x. The plot here actually shows the real component of the wave function; in general, it is complex, and it is complex in this situation.
Classically, if something is on the left side of the barrier created by U(x), it shouldn't be able to cross to the other side at all without being supplied external energy. Intuitively, imagine that I roll a literal ball to the right. You would expect it to bounce back at you. However, in quantum mechanics, it totally can appear on the other side of the barrier. Why? Based on the graph, the wave function has some nonzero magnitude on the right side of the barrier.
So this meme implies that some of the swords are going to appear on the other side of the wall.