You know, if I were going to pick a fight with a military world power, I’d at least have the good sense not to do it during the run up to a head-of-state election.
Humans are so massively susceptible to gamification. It's nice for providing motivation, but it ends up being like an addiction the way companies leverage it.
Yeah, I saw it the other day. I would bet a lot of money that the information was already stored. In fact, if their data group didn't already store that information (link clicks to external websites) they should all be fired. This is just a way that you can find something that you'd previously looked at on facebook (which, oddly, may be the only site on the planet with a worse search function than reddit).
Is it necessary to be FOSS, or is free good enough? If cost is the only driver and the backup is local to a regular device, I can recommend SyncBack for simple backups on their free version. I bought Pro several years ago and there is no ongoing licensing fee. When they add certain services I would find useful, or as tech progresses, I'll upgrade but there's no ongoing cost and it runs reliably for me. It's also very windows-centric in terms of its design and UI, which makes it relatively easy to use. Granted I wouldn't give it to my mother to set up for herself, but it will run unattended once set up.
Many these cities are unsustainable as modern cities. Their creation and golden periods were marked by lavish spending of royalty and/or wealthy merchants (today’s billionaire class, but without jets and yachts to spend on). It’s almost impossible to rebuild to modern, tourist level usage without massive cash infusions and disruption of services for that maintenance.
These should, instead, be implemented by NFC. You tap their "reader" with your phone, never surrendering it, and they get your ID number just like a merchant gets your CC info for a charge. Their backend pulls up your record just as if they'd scanned the qr code on the back of your physical card. Or you can locally transmit a facsimile image to a promiscuous reader (airdrop/nearby share) you approve.
Nobody actually enjoys these social networks. We only stay marginally involved so we can keep tabs on our older family members and maybe a group that won't migrate to a generic platform.
I’m going to start out with the obvious- that most of these arguments are copypasta from a decade and a half ago when smartphones got cameras. Distracting. What about the gym? Easy for bad actors to abuse (OMGWTFBBQ!)
The glare from headlights comment was weird. Do the lenses not include an AR coating, or perhaps the author doesn’t normally wear glasses? I decided to check on that last one and was surprised that there was no by line, just a generic nyt link - not even to the article. Of course Brian X Chen appears to be a real NYT journalist, but in no other online pictures does he wear glasses, so I presume he doesn’t wear corrective lenses or he wears contacts. Not too surprising then that the glasses - and a big, black, fat-rimmed resin model at that - would be distracting, even outside of the decisions to record or not.
Which brings up the last bit - to record you have to initiate it. I presume this is for battery life, as powering the sensor, processing, and transmission to a storage device all take non-trivial amounts of power for a device that small. For the panicky fear of constant surveillance the article has I expected it was an always-on live-stream to the Meta servers that was occurring. Color me unimpressed.
Since even inadvertent or unintentional copying can be punished as infringement, any takedown should be subject to the same level of scrutiny and false claims should be awarded statutory damages matching infringement of registered works, collectible by the party who’s non-infringing work was blocked, but actionable by any party who is denied access. So if you can’t get to content due to DMCA you can sue, but you cannot recover damages or expenses - if you win, the $175k(?) per fraudulent take down is payable to the content owner. In that way, it’s recognized that an individual looking for content is injured by the takedown, but there is no financial incentive for take-down vigilantism.
You think the old bird is bad, you should see the rabid slobbering of neckbeards still obsessed with reddit or the masticating Meta connecting Threads to Activity pub. The impotent outrage is palpable.
I don't think the "indicators" are a useful metric of personal betterment, which is what makes individual people feel better about the economy. Stock market being up, interest rates and inflation going down, productivity up and salaries on the increase are all positive conditions. But if your salary isn't rising as fast as the combined inflation of the past 4 years and all of your companies profits are feeding dividends and stock buy-backs instead of plant expansion and increasing benefits then it's a net negative in your bank account at the end of the month. Insurance rates - auto, health, homeowners (esp if you're coastal) are soaring up, which hits the average pocketbook but probably has no weight in economic indicators. Lord help you if you're paying tuition or taking out loans for college. It's more than $4000 per class at a typical state university, if you're not subsidized by scholarship or the state.
It doesn't help that the news cycle is (somewhat rightly) pointing out how imbalanced and broken the socioeconomic system is.
Yeah, it’s high on my list. Along with a half dozen other AAAs from the last decade. I think Cyberpunk is next on my list, though there’s a Fallout languishing on my Deck I keep meaning to go back to.
lol- yup. It’s free in the same way that building your own house is free. Which is true if you already have the skills and free time. And even if you’re light on skills there’s tons of YouTube videos and forums where you can get any technical data you need. Right?
the whole network could be run with a cleverly configured raspberry pi
Which would defeat the entire purpose of a distributed blockchain. I'm ribbing you, of course, on that ;-) Bitcoin was not built for efficiency and the very basis of distributed proof of work trades efficiency for security. The more "successful" it gets, the larger the incentive to waste power in a fight to win each block reward becomes - by design.
You know, if I were going to pick a fight with a military world power, I’d at least have the good sense not to do it during the run up to a head-of-state election.