Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)OM
Posts
0
Comments
391
Joined
7 mo. ago

  • Also fair. but that actually opens up a whole bunch of opportunity. There could be so many easter eggs hidden in what the live action actors are actually saying, versus what the mupets are saying.

  • An entire movie with half being lip synced live action sounds awful to make. That's a lot of lip syncing.

    But I'm sure there's a bunch of tools and talent out there that could make this happen. And it'd be a fantastic movie.

  • Yes and no. In an ideal situation, those are smooth surfaces and it isn't a problem. There are situations were they can be bunched up and not as smooth of course, but that's at least for me less of an occurrence than with clothes.

  • Yeah, that's pretty similar, the main difference being the setting. For me, I can only really tolerate books if they're science fiction for some reason.

    But yeah, that book was so bad it honestly makes me want to take a crack at the idea myself and see if I can do it better.

    I know I probably can't, I have very little writing experience. But it's gotta be at least worth the attempt.

  • Not a film, but a novel:

    Starflight 3000 by R.W. Mackelworth

    If I remember, it was about this asteroid called "The Biosphere" that got hollowed out and sent on relativistic speeds through deep space to seed other solar systems with human colonies. The inside of it was set up like a giant rural town with massive skies, and a foot print the size of New York. And that's a cool ass premise.

    But the book was so fucking milquetoast and bland. I could not tell you anything about the protagonist, their challenges, or anything.

  • A potential strategy for using it for good would be dealing with the problem of comparitive effort to spread and debunk bullshit. It takes very little effort to spread bullshit. It takes a lot of effort to debunk it.

    An LLM doesn't need to worry about effort. It can happily chug away debunking bullshit all day long, at least, if you ignore the problem of them not being able to reason, and the other ongoing problems with LLMs. But there is potential for it being a part of the solution here.

  • There was no time component specified by which ownership is kept or lost

    Nor did I say there was.

    This is one of the prime cruxes of the private property argument is the ability for some to own property they don’t occupy all the time.

    The time has nothing to do with this.

  • My group did a multi-shot where we played ourselves, and we each set each other's stats. Each of us took a turn being DM so we could each play ourselves.

    Mine was something like 8, 9, 8, 14, 12, 8

    I'd have to dig up that ancient sheet to know for sure.

    Then I spent a decent chunk of the campaign trying to build a phone charger out of random things you'd find in Chult.

  • You're making up a rule that isn't a part of the definition of personal property.

    Your home is still the place you live at even if you're not currently in it. You address doesn't change the moment you step out of your house does it? You use it by it being your place of residence, and that happens at all times.