Nougat @ Nougat @kbin.social

I am trying to focus on posting source documents, as opposed to someone els

---

Read more

Posts

22

Comments

1,917

Joined

2 yr. ago

And the remaining 58% are having dinner at the same table as them.

Honestly, even for twenty bucks, you can probably get a cheap rechargeable vape kit.

"... my country ..."

That's what caught my eye.

https://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/FAQs/primaryElectionsFAQ.html

Q2. Who can vote in a Primary Election?

A2. During either the Presidential or June primary:

• Voters affiliated with a major party: may cast a ballot for candidates of the party they are affiliated with.
• Voters affiliated with a minor party: if there is a minor party contest those affiliated with that minor party may cast a ballot for those candidates.
• Unaffiliated voters: An unaffiliated voter may cast a ballot for any one political party. If an unaffiliated voter returns a ballot with more than one political party, the ballot will be rejected and none of the votes will be counted.

If you are registered with a specific party, you may not vote in another party's primary in the state of Colorado, even if you "think you'd like to."

I'm sure that because my experience is limited, there's things I need to learn - but I definitely understand people's hesitation to jump to an EV in the absence of that knowledge.

I've had a hybrid, 2013 Fusion, which would get 40MPG. Now I have a PHEV 2015 Fusion, and with our driving habits, it does 53MPG overall.

However.

We bought the 2015 with about 36K miles on it, and at that time, the plug-in battery range was about 20 miles. Today, at almost 90K miles, that range is down to 10 or 11. Replacing the battery module (which includes both the PHEV and hybrid batteries, they're separate components in the electrical system, but come together in one module) is about $10K just for the part. The car is worth less than that today.

My hesitation to buy a fully electric vehicle is because I don't want to find myself with a car that has half its original range at only 100K miles (say, six or seven years), and would cost more than a used car to repair, or have little resale value. A decent and reasonably maintained ICE car should easily go 160K miles (perhaps a lot more) without having to have a repair on that scale done.

Not what I'm saying at all. There are certainly parts that I read more lightly than others, because they had to do with what the district court did and said (as well as other background and history I'm already familiar with), and I'd already read that. The three dissenting opinions are at the end; the majority opinion addressed every single misplaced concern in those, so those weren't terribly demanding (or well written), either.

When I had the thought of my original comment here, it's because I'd read it, and I was only confident to make such a comment because I'd read it.

There's not a ton I can say to "prove" anything to anyone here, but I am the person who made a place for posting such documents, which should indicate my interest. This ruling is one of the most important court rulings in American history. I saw the articles talking about it, went to documentcloud to find it, posted it, settled in to read it.

I wonder how he squares the fact that the petitioners were Republicans and independents - you know, people who are qualified to vote in the Republican primary.

There’s a lot of citations throughout that can be skipped over.

I read it. It's not lawyer talk.

Edit: And I have the chat log here where I was talking with a friend about the high points while I read it. Started Tuesday 12/19 5:45p CT, ended just before 900p the same evening.

I wonder how many of them actually read the decision, and how many are just depending on what's filtered through journalistic agendas?

Okay, Neville Chamberlain.

"Convicted" is not the correct term here. That would (outside of impeachment) require a criminal charge, followed by a guilty plea or a trial, and if a trial, a finding of guilty by the finder of fact (either a judge or a jury).

As a finding of fact, in both a Colorado district court, and in the Colorado Supreme Court, Trump "engaged in insurrection." I would need to look and see whether Michigan and Minnesota courts found the same fact.

None of the 14A S3 cases charge anyone with any crime.

When you get in bed and the moon is shining like a spotlight on your face.

It'll just be another avenue through which Huffman can put his thumb on the scales and tune the content to his own liking.

Today is a good day to Fry.

Call of the void. My understanding is that it's your brain inventing risky scenarios so that you can shrink from them in revulsion, as practice for "don't do that."

Articles must be relevant to US political news.

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/24233452/colorado-ruling.pdf

https://kbin.social/m/OriginalDocuments/t/713941/The-Supreme-Court-of-the-State-of-Colorado-Order-Affirmed

Let me guess, they've "summoned" the ambassador to an important meeting in a 9th floor hotel room with an ample balcony and no awnings.