Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)NO
Posts
3
Comments
2,560
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I moved from a location that had fluoride where I grew up, to one that didn't as an adult, and with the same oral routine, I went from 1 cavity to like a dozen and multiple root canals.

    I'm not saying my routine was sufficient and I've gotten better at it, but if people are used to one thing and it suddenly changes, they're gonna be pretty surprised at the impact.

  • Android dev of many many many years here.

    Android Studio with Jetpack Compose.

    I'd also suggest you try doing kotlin multiplatform. You can take your Android app and end up with a iOS app, and if you want, a desktop app. You would need a Mac for the ios app eventually, but not for the desktop apps.

    There is minimal work to get it set up to start, they provide a wizard, and there are a lot of libraries available now that are multiplatform.

    IOS and Desktop are both considered stable now, but the iOS beta was pretty solid.

    All the apps it generates are native apps.

    Even if you don't want to do multiplatform to start, if you use kotlkn only libraries that are capable of it, you could easily switch to it in the future if you wanted to as it'd be structured properly from the start.

    E.g for libraries if you use Koin instead of Dagger2/hilt you could switch to multiplatform in the future without much effort. If you chose dagger instead, it'd be a big task to switch. And if you start it as multiplatform but Android only, you'll know which areas still need implementation work later to eventually work on iOS.

  • There are some autonomous cars with lidar out there where the lidar is so powerful it can wreck a camera close up, but is still safe for eyes.

    Switch up FaceID to use a more powerful laser which will wreck the phones camera, and start making webcams for non macs that are required to have this in them for Teams to work.

  • A thing would need to officially be a flop to be considered squandered like the Cybertruck is looking like.

    They might have a few failures ahead of them yet though, but you can't call a mid flight project squandered.

    Edit: e.g part of that loss could be attributed to them finalizing and now starting production at the megapack factory at Shanghai. Short of Elon backlash stopping sales of their commercial batteries, that won't be squandered and will make a billion or two or three in profits this year.

  • The article doesn't say they've never made a profit on any of their cars. If that's what you got from that, you should try reading it again.

    Also, if you make 1 billion in profit on something, and then spend 2 billion researching and developing and setting up a factory to build a new product, you end up with a loss of 1 billion. That does not mean your first thing is unprofitable. This is pretty basic stuff.

    The vehicles are profitable, they just didn't provide enough profit this quarter to cover their R&D and capital expenditures for growth.

    Edit: Sorry, and in case it wasn't clear, their R&D and capital expenditures dwarf the ZEV credits every quarter.

  • This is a good start to learn about it

    https://cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/reduce-your-risk/know-your-environment/radon

    These are approved devices

    https://c-nrpp.ca/approved-radon-measurement-devices/

    There are cheaper options where you just leave a test item in a specific area for 90 days and then ship it to them to be analyzed, or there's more expensive electronic options that give quicker readings. It's possible a local library or other community spot might have electronic ones available to rent/borrow as well.

    Generally you want to measure over an extended period of time as the amount of Radon that is present can vary over time. It is also worse in the winter as we keep our doors/windows closed more often giving it a better chance to build up, and measuring in the basement is best as thats where it would build up the most.

    If your home happens to be in a spot where there's too much radon, you'd have to install a system that exchanges the air between the inside/outside at some frequency.

    You probably won't find a house with 0 radon, it's just a matter of how much is present and if it's too much.

  • It kinda is to be honest... The magnificent 7 as they call it, dominate the S&P500. I don't have today's figures, but recently it's been as much as 30% of the index.

    Any falter in big tech, or even one of these individual companies like Tesla, can have a huge impact on peoples pensions.

    Edit: I guess if you still wanted to invest in something like this as a pension, but wanted to avoid a specific company, you could find a way to hedge against them to make it neutral. I don't know if any do that though.

  • Not a single tesla vehicle has ever been profitable as an actual vehicle.

    This honestly couldn't be further from the truth.

    Tesla's vehicles once ramped have always been extremely profitable (except probably the CyberTruck as it hasn't properly ramped due to low demand)

    Any losses you see are due to their aggressive growth involving capital expenditures and research and development. It's not that the vehicle isn't profitable.

    The ZEV credits are just bonus money that they can then leverage to expand faster.

    Edit: If you want to try and see this another way that might make sense... The Model S and X were very profitable, but they didn't make enough money to fund the expansion for the Model 3 and Y. Ditch the Model 3 and Y, and remain a boutique luxury car company, and they would posted profits instead of losses. It wasn't the cars losing money, it was the growth. The ZEV credits accelerated that growth immensely by giving them more breathing room.

  • There are other electric semi trucks out there, but none (at least as of last year) compare in specs and capabilities. The big issue is their power consumption is much higher than the Tesla Semi which has been repeatedly validated by their testers as even better than what Tesla advertises. Efficiency will be king in this kind of business.

    Worse efficiency = less range = more batteries = less load capacity = less money per delivery

    E.g this is from DHL

    https://www.dhl.com/global-en/delivered/responsibility/dhl-tests-tesla-semi-electric-truck.html

    Over a two-week trial period this summer, DHL Supply Chain USA took a thorough look under the hood of the Tesla Semi, integrating the e-truck into 3,000 miles (5,000 km) of normal operations out of Livermore, California. The trial included one long haul of 390 miles (625 km) – fully loaded with a gross combined weight of 75,000 pounds (34 metric tons) – confirming the Tesla Semi’s ability to carry typical DHL payloads over a long distance on a single charge.

    During the trial, the trial vehicle averaged 1.72 kWh/mile operating at speeds exceeding 50 mph (80 km/h) on average for over half its time on the road. The result exceeded our expectations and even Tesla’s own rating.

    Putting the Tesla Semi to the test allowed us to validate whether it could travel 500 miles with a fully loaded trailer and see what our drivers thought of the truck’s performance. We were encouraged by how quickly they gained confidence with the vehicle and leveraged the Tesla’s smart features to help improve performance, comfort, and the overall driver experience.

  • I frequently took unpaid time off at my jobs as I used all my paid time off for various vacations.

    Tesla might not accommodate such requests though, so a sudden week off might be something someone would jump at for a last minute vacation.