NoneOfUrBusiness @ NoneOfUrBusiness @kbin.social

Posts

1

Comments

2,052

Joined

2 yr. ago

So then what's that case supposed to be?

car makers just jack up their prices so they make more off the subsidy

Exactly.

And then you remember that the pen was actually the former's and the latter stole it.

Really we should be subsidizing EVs from our own manufacturers.

You are. Still not doing much to corporate greed.

It does, but that's the thing: It does either way. There should be no change due to the conversion of energy to mass.

I mean no, but the people with meteorology degrees are probably not gonna be working a job where the number one requirement is to be hot (and not, y'know, have a meteorology degree).

Correct me if I am wrong, but as I understand it mass and energy is equivalent no?

Yes.

And it also still baffles us as to why rest mass and resultant mass from energy should be equivalent at all?

I don't know about this one. I'm not an expert so don't quote he on it, but I don't remember hearing this before.

No no that's a completely different phenomenon. This is the phenomenon involved in Hawking's radiation and similar.

It's that they're using a more normal people term. They probably wanted to say vacuum.

So I wonder, even if it’s only appearing very briefly it’s still going to exert some small gravitational effect.

I don't think so. Remember: This is energy being converted to mass, not mass coming out of nowhere.

Not that I doubt it, but what did the US do to Canada?

Nope, they actually appear and disappear. The idea is that even in vacuum there's a certain amount of background energy and that energy can randomly turn into matter-antimatter pairs in what is basically the inverse of matter-antimatter annihilation.

IKFR? If America wants to lose India to China then go the fuck ahead.

Okay good point about the threat WWII Japan posed but you're going too far in the other direction. When asked about going to war with America admiral Yamamoto said what amounts to "this is a bad idea don't". Now part of their failure definitely lies in poor leadership, and I can see the idea that if they'd concentrated on America instead of opening a war on three (two and a half?) fronts they might've made significant gains until America's industry caught up, but they simply didn't have the industrial base to keep the US down. The US also has very good natural defenses that you forgot to take into account. Remember: Their ships and airplanes were all handmade.

Israel’s needs are a sliver of what Russia uses in Ukraine.

Russia has been importing weapons from North Korea, and Israel uses absolutely ridiculous amounts of ammunition for their size.

Palestinians only have one method of resistance left, and that's violence. Telling them to not use it because Israelis might get hurt is, and I'm sorry to say this, frankly ridiculous. If Israelis don't want to get hurt maybe they should give Palestinians the state they've been asking for for forty years. I understand your concern, but the onus to prevent this outcome is squarely on Israel; as colonized people Palestinians have the right to use all means necessary to obtain their freedom.

That said, you're most likely worrying over nothing. Hamas doesn't have the capability to overthrow Israel; their operations mostly serve to lose Israel face on the international stage. The only scenario in which Israel falls is if America completely leaves it out to the wolves and the middle east tears it apart, which is extremely unlikely.

Most citizens of Israel have not brought it upon themselves.

Okay I understand the reflex to explain how governments don't represent their people, but look at this and you might wanna reconsider. Netanyahu didn't come out of nowhere; he came in when the only man in Israeli history who had the potential to actually end the conflict was assassinated (after Netanyahu and his ilk went in parades calling for his assassination) and since then it's all been genocidal maniacs (save for one guy in 2008 who still didn't have the guts to actually do something worthwhile), mostly Netanyahu himself. Now I don't believe in "push the Zionists into the sea" rhetoric, and the only time it was realistic was in 49' anyway, but the conduct of the Israeli public these past few months in particular and in the past 30 years in general has been nothing short of fucking disgusting. If Israel does fall and they're persecuted by the new regime, anyone who wasn't explicitly pushing for peace (and children and the like of course) is getting nothing but Schafenfreude from me.

All of this is excluding foreign-born citizens of Israel; anyone who willingly went to that place and isn't explicitly calling for peace is a piece of shit.

They had every right to respond to the attack from Hamas

I mean if history started on October 7th.

Cut off all support and Israel buddies up with China, India, or possibly even Russia.

Ain't happening. I don't know why India would even be involved here, and China has no need to project power over the middle east. Russia would be importing weapons from Israel, not the other way around.

Yeah. The protests aren't because Bibi's actions are too right-wing; they're because even as a far-right leader he's doing a shit job. Him being a genocidal far right leader isn't, as a rule, an issue with the general Israeli public. You can look at this if you wanna lose some faith in humanity.

There are protests against Bibi because of his disregard for the hostages' lives and attempt to destroy Israeli democracy. His party isn't losing support AFAIK, and the right wing is actually growing.