NoneOfUrBusiness @ NoneOfUrBusiness @fedia.io

Posts

2

Comments

2,853

Joined

1 yr. ago

The beginning was like two months ago; we're now about 40% of the way in.

Uh... Of fucking course? There's a reason the poem mentions trade unionists.

Mahmoud Khalil should've been the breaking point. Anyone didn't understand the urgency of the matter then is gonna reenact that one poem or be dragged screaming and kicking into reality.

The Guardian runs on donations and has no relation to the British Government so I'm not sure what you're talking about.

Eh, not when it's Israel.

The guns are to prevent violent suppression of that public support.

That's one part of it, but also people should be defending themselves and their communities from ICE and one way to do that is guns. When an ICE agent is arresting your neighbor the correct option isn't to preach nonviolence, but to pull the damn trigger.

Maybe it makes sense legally, but that only means the law is wrong.

Whyte said the ruling meant that "there is no one that can test the legality of the government's commitments to international conventions in this case."

They were trying to say (I think) that thie isn't a new phenomenon. Their government didn't get them to go along with anything, because their genocide predates their government.

Under the current administration? 100%.

See my response to the other guy.

So first, this law is about immigration lawyers, not all lawyers. Only victimless crimes/"crimes" are being punished here, not lies that actually hurt people. Second, you're focusing on lies (the "communicating misleading information" part) and not the "misrepresenting or withholding information" part. That's a lot more than just lying, and would mean the lawyer would have to give any and all information that's vaguely relevant to the case to the detriment of their client—it in effect forces lawyers to incriminate their clients (again, for what are victimless crimes or not crimes at all). Also the "misrepresenting information" part can be very abusable. Would you trust a Conservative with that power?

They do use human shields, constantly.

Citation needed.

No it's not.

The proposed regulations prohibit a legal professional, who represents or advises someone for payment, from misrepresenting or withholding information, advising them to misrepresent or withhold information, or communicating misleading information.

This is dystopian as fuck and is another unnecessary attempt to crack down on immigrants.

And yes, Hamas is playing an asymmetrical game and using the rules of engagement as a shield

They're not, for the most part. This is Israeli propaganda that really took hold, but there was never any evidence for the human shields stuff.

I mean it's the definition of insanity if Einstein is to be believed.

Now I think the latest permutation of this need to feel pure and civilized has included just….all “non Americans,” including any foreigners they don’t consider “proper and civilized.”

If this is true, then I wonder how much the war on terror has contributed to this.

It doesn’t answer the questions “Why am I here? What is my purpose?” beyond like…their death, which is forever away.

I don't think that's true, because non-Western Christians don't have this problem while atheist white Americans do.

It should've started before the election. The time to avoid this outcome was February to August 2024.

Setting aside the fact that the government pandering to anti-immigration sentiment will generally dissuade high-skill migrants, being able to get citizenship easily is an attractive prospect.

The house always wins.

Okay, and? The crimes American soldiers committed against the Iraqi people (including waging an illegal war of aggression in the first place) aren't something that can be excused by "but they offered me money".