No, you don't understand! Russians fight pure and with honour when they bomb. Ukraine has to be punished by more bombing! As the wise people on the Russian TV say: by all means necessary should they bomb civilians, so their spirit is broken. Even nuclear weapons.
Glide bombs glide on initial inertia. They have to be dropped from the highest possible point at around 15 k meters to get them to fly the furthest. Patriot system can detect them way before that.
Ukraine is using a limited amount of relatively old western weapons. The atacams it got are 30 years old and only cluster ones. If it got a fair amount of the normal ones, that are already all but deprecated in USA, that alone would be somewhat of a game changer.
There is nothing wrong with over-engineered weapons.
I'm trying to picture any other sustained conflict with western weapons and nothing comes to mind.
Im sure Joe has a mountain of people to interpret the numbers.
Truth is, numbers are bad. Just the other day there was an abysmal poll that showed people trust trump more on everything but behaving well and abortion. Not by a thin margin. I don't know much about it, but It was reported on a reputable left wing network.
It's really not looking good for him and for the Democrats that have no backup plan. The right have succeeded to portray him as a frail senile incompetent man with corruption issues. It's a failure of the democrat establishment.
Yes! It's just not as good and more importantly, it's not good enough. At first I thought it's because I'm not as familiar, but no, they are just not set up as good as Adobe. That's the bottom line. Why waste time.
Yes. Bought the whole package. I decided that this is the software for me and tried to use it. After two months, I gave up.
It's not bad, it's just not as good. It just takes an extra click here and there, a function less here and there, an illogical here and there and that culminates to my work being done slower and me being annoyed. Affinity designer being the worst, missing auto tracing and messing up svg exports.
Not to mention the new generative ai functions that are now natively in Adobe products. That's literal gold. You can't be a serious designer and not use that. That saves up so much time, it's not possible to not have. Not possible.
Adobe won. We can cry about it and whine, but they won. To bad, but it is what it is.
And the subscription price. It's easy to get 50% off on deals for the whole package. That's about 35 per month. That is a negligible. That's like less than an hour of work on a freelancers hourly rate.
Sorry, I thought everyone will understand that I'm taking about photoshop, illustrator, indesign, AE and not that every single Adobe product ever made is absolutely better than every single other product that has ever been made ever....
Next time, I will try to be more precise. I deeply apologise
Delusional?
I'm sure you just mean to capture my attention, but you dont have to try like that.
I'm not here to defend Adobe or praise their products. For the last 2 years I have done my best to get rid of them and finally, about a month ago I conceded and payed for the subscription again.
Let me tell you, there is no software (none, 0), that can do half what photoshop can do and is less buggy.
That doesn't say, photoshop or any other Adobe product is not buggy and doesn't have issues, it's just a fact there is no competition.
I say that completely confidently and with no delusion anywhere.
As a designer that uses figma every day, I have to say....
... I don't care one bit. I have to subscribe and use Adobe software anyway, not only because everyone else uses them, but because that's simply the best graphic software out there and I've tried it all.
Not too mention that the full Adobe subscription, that you can usually get 50% off, is not that expensive anyway, compared to many saas that are buggy and just do one simple thing.
So yeah, I don't hate Adobe anymore, everyone is doing what they are doing and most of the software out there is complete garbage and even more expensive.
I don't get it, I know the posts of these apps look similar, but these are two very different apps. One has verified users with phone numbers, with names and surnames, posting about their lives and selling products.
Well, actually mastodon would have more of those of it were bigger. But the content is different.
If mastodon users would just see the threads content, but not be able to interact normally, then I think it's obvious this is bad for mastodon and instances should defederate.
But Facebook doesn't care about a few mastodon users either way.
Maybe they just want an option to be a part of it when twitter goes down, try and get a piece of it.
Come on, Facebook is not trying to do anything. They don't care about mastodon and their pathetic million of users. Facebook is trying stuff hoping something will stick,that's all. Threads is not their main app and they are losing on it.
That's why I said voters. It doesn't matter, that's not the point. Point is, it can happen again. Just a few slip ups from a frail octogenarian known for having slip ups.
You think EU can pick up the slack? All they do is make vague promises then end up sueing eachother.
Absolutely true! Russians never bomb civilians or target civilians in any way! Its the Ukrainian air defense that is causing civilian casualties!