Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
0
Comments
406
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • 😂 Is it states or countries now? Yes. Other countries have not caused hundreds of millions of people to be in extreme poverty.
    Other countries also do not have:
    动态网自由门 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Free Tibet 六四天安門事件 The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989. 天安門大屠殺 The Tiananmen Square Massacre 反右派鬥爭 The Anti-Rightist Struggle.
    大躍進政策 The Great Leap Forward
    文化大革命 The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution.
    新疆維吾爾自治區 The Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region

  • Yes. No other country had hundreds of millions of people in extreme poverty.

  • I thought we were talking about after Mao? Please decide.

  • What? English please. Here's an article. This one explains why this oh so huge achievement has not been made in other countries. To save everyone some time: Because no other country had this problem.

    If you wanna bring up a "risk of poverty" then please also provide some statistics on why this is relevant.
    The CCP doesn't even have a statistic on this.

    https://www.ilo.org/static/english/intserv/working-papers/wp023/index.html

  • Weak punches are still punches

  • What does you have understanded?

  • Reversing policies that killed millions and is the reason for 800 million people being in extreme poverty does only exist in china. Yes.
    And being less shit is not a success story.
    Still a TofuDreg Dictatorship

  • I am asking again. Do you understand english enough to follow what we are saying?
    Because you just linked a statistic on poverty. A statistic that as you can see started at 25 (in a time where this data wasnt even tracked) and ended at 12.
    Your heartwarming story about china and its 0.7 Percent is; let me bold this so you see the difference; extreme poverty. And again. Chinas poverty is directly in relation to policies made by the chinese ruling party.
    Chona started at 98% and is still on a modest 14+

    Great Britain in 2020 had a poverty rate (5.50 per day) of 0.7 percent.
    China has 20 times that. Just editing that in here because later you compared britain to china.

    I am asking again if you understand what i am writing. Because you made it very clear up to this point thst you do not understand.

  • No i am not. I literally said it isnt in 3 of my answers to you. Do you know how to read? Do you want me to communicate in Chinese with you?

  • You're literally spouting ccp propaganda and downplaying chinas involvement in the poverty of the ones they allegwdly got out of poverty. Also you do not even understand the srticles you post. The poverty line that china is supposedly lifting people out of is 1 dollar a day. That is the poverty line of a third world country. China is not a third world country.

  • The US didnt have to lift X people out of poverty because it never had this problem in the first place. The US didnt let millions die in famines. There is also no other country boasting about how many people they got to a survivable state since 1980.

    How well is your understanding of english? We already discussed what you think is a counterargument before you came up with it.

    The fact that you dont understand why i chose france shows that your understanding of these arguments and the underlying reasons are too high for you.

    Let me rephrase it for a 5 year old.
    France had royalty and many rich people but also many many poor people. Those lived under poverty. They then killed the royalty and reshaped france. Now france is better and those people were not in poverty anymore. Does this make sense to you?

  • No i meant Boot. As in Bootlicker.

  • " For example, the World Bank draws a higher poverty line for upper-middle-income countries, which tries to reflect economic conditions. It sets this at $5.50 a day. China is now an upper-middle-income country, says the bank.

    About a quarter of China's population is in poverty, according to this metric. For comparison, this is slightly higher than Brazil.

    And there is widespread income inequality. Last year, Chinese Premier Li Keqiang said China still had 600 million people whose monthly income was barely 1,000 yuan ($154). He said that was not enough to rent a room in a city.

    The great leap forward is the reason so many people from extreme poverty died and reversing those changes is not liftig people out of poverty but reversing changes that put people in extreme poverty.".

    Yes, by 1980 third world country standards china has a 0.7 percent poverty rate. Thats ignoring 40 years of development of the rest of the world. And also that china is not a third world country anymore.

    Go move into a Tofu Dreg Highrise and tell me how good it looks from up there.

  • Said the CCP Boot

  • Not what Guildo guy was going for but yes, horrible thing and that did improve ehm... statistics.

  • Probably...

  • What statistics? The one the CCP made up? Over a quarter of chinese are still in extreme poverty and a huge amount of chinese still have an income of under 1500 yuan a month.
    Sure, they might have lifted some people out of poverty, but they also put them into poverty in the first place under mao. So celebrating this is kind of self congratulatory.

  • Touché. I would like to counter that with "Not a desktop though" and end my turn with "wine required to use company software"