Nobilmantis @ Nobilmantis @feddit.it

Signore dei mari, lmao

---

Read more

Posts

8

Comments

135

Joined

2 yr. ago

That was a very interesting read, thank you!

Absolutely true but i have the feeling OP doesn't come from a country where that level of education is free or accessible to everyone.

Sir, here is your pass for "things whose end justify the mean", have a good day.

Sir, you are a chad.

Im putting the link in the comment so if anyone needs it they can find it easily

Ohhh okay very interesting, thank you. I will add the list to my followed as well.

lmfao spit my tea

That's cool but you can't search through it and the way the list is displayed makes it so there is no game title in text so Ctrl+F isn't possible either. Am I missing something?

Is there a way to tell if a game is using this crap?

EDIT 3: Another auto-updated list of games to avoid that use Denuvo

EDIT: found this list, will leave it here in case someone needs it. (REPORTED TO BE OUTDATED)

EDIT 2: also as they pointed out in the comments (for Steam users) this list is more updated, and if you follow it, it shows you if a game uses denuvo or not when you are browsing a game's store page.

".com.tw" lmao i see what they did there

The process is broken if the people you rely on suck. It is inevitable that someone, in a form or another, will be representative of the group of people you are part of (may it be a dictator, an influential priest, or an elected representative); we have the luxury of living in (somewhat?) democratic countries. The way out of surveillance misuse is making (or forcing) our politicians pass laws that restrict what companies or agencies can do with our data, or how they can use them. I think spreading awareness about this topic is the most effective way to push these kind of rules in effect.

While individualistic "guerrilla privacy" might be effective for yourself, it's like a band-aid on a broken bone. If 99% of the people around you don't care about it, or simply are unaware (family, neighbours, friends), you will join the surveillance system no matter what: from a family member uploading your details to meta, to a stranger taking a picture with you in it and posting it, to your neighbors ring camera, to your friend's iPhone constantly scanning the surroundings to report nearby devices (your phone, for instance) to "improve location data".

If there is no laws that prevent evil actors from misusing this power, really little changes in the bigger picture by you using signal or protonmail (while you should do it, don't get me wrong).

EDIT: i know this will be controversial, but to me this is a good metaphor for it: the world is slowly getting hotter due to companies just caring about profits and politicians passing no laws to reverse the process, while instead actually taking bribes from those companies to not do anything about it (look, look, it's the same duo again) and your solution is... You dig an underground bunker to survive the next heatwave/hurricane.

To the 3 spainiards reading this: it's a decoy. They fearmonger about civil rights because it makes the press talk a lot, meanwhile they slowly demolish the social state. It's a common pattern for right-wing/far-right european politicians lately.

If the polls prove true at the elections, I would keep an eye on your healthcare, education and transportation systems.

• an Italian

Such an interesting species these americans, so their very complicated-looking justice system comes down to a duel between their wallets basically?

Convenient how the individual-centric capitalist west always talk about "China emissions" as a whole while the per-capita is never mentioned.

Shit smells like Google's browser add-on Google tells you to install if you want to opt-out of Google's tracking. Nice.

This is the first time I will be on this other side of this argument, but let me disagree. The technology behind it isn't inherently bad, it's the people running the system having access to it that scares us. Take Snowden for example; when he exposed what the NSA was doing with US citizens data (with the help of big companies), do you think he meant that the internet or security cameras are the threat? They sure as hell are a good vector, but you don't trash nor blame your pc for being the mean though which that is achieved. The problem is who we put in power and how we held them accountable for misusing it.

AI is officially the current catch-all tech term for news titles right now

Should have used public transport ;)

Technicallythetruth

Meta will face daily fines of 1 million Norwegian Krone (€89,500) if it doesn’t comply with the order.

Mhhh

Edit: should have made it proportional to their revenue (as it should be done with every other fine)

I feel like it is still too early to talk about "AI cannibalization" or "feedback loops" as that would mean that a big proportion of the training data is AI-generated content itself, against all the rest that could be scraped off the internet or the public domain, I don't think this is happening yet.

What people might experience instead, and perceive as dumbness, is that given that the datasets used to train AIs cannot really change that much in a short time (unless we wait for another hundred years so humans can produce actual human original content to train the AI again), and as the mathematical models used to build answers based on the datasets are pretty much the same, a person talking with ChatGPT will over time perceive more and more that the answers are built using a "pattern" or a "structure", aka the model derived from feeding the dataset into the AI training itself.

Just my pennies on this, let's also consider that is in human nature to be excited for something new that sounds cool, and then to get bored when you got accustomed to it and pushed it to its boundaries.