NoSpiritAnimal @ NoSpiritAnimal @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

424

Joined

2 yr. ago

As somebody with kids, I feel the same way. People asking "are you gonne have more?" Or "were you trying?"

Like yeah I jazz up in there on the reg Aunt Linda thanks for asking about me dropping these loads, pass the ham.

Tacquito can go about his business

Lol more convinced than ever they're following some Canadian/Vermont kid on a bus trip back north, just because he stopped a night in a NY hostel and wore the wrong type of jacket on his morning coffee run.

They're all at my house hell yeah 😎

Yeah totally

Zoloft just means I get more cardio

The first one is a dark brown or green zip up with a built in hood, the second one is a green button up over a hoodie.

They're barely similar. The NYPD has too much of nothing.

It's like these:

My left

Ok I'm only going to say one nice thing about edge, the PDF editing functionality is on par with Adobe and it's free.

I was born into a poor family if genetic CEOs. We've lost our ancestral claims to the shareholders. We used to conduct layoffs from the Urals to the Black Sea. Not anymore.

We were a proud people, passing down strong CEO genes.

Me seeing Sainz appearing in the wild

She tumbled on my meat surface until she extracted my salt-soluble protein binding agent.

Ok everyone trade one to the left

Next you'll tell us that kids don't think logically about situations, particularly regarding the adults that they love.

No, my point with "functionally" is that it can be killed.

Biological immortality is a very specific concept indicating an absence of aging and the absence of an increase in expected mortality along with age.

I just mean that something can still eat it. This is an easy concept to understand if you're not focused on correcting people needlessly.

This is what I mean by functionally.

There is a functional difference between being pedantic about the word "functionally" and supplying relevant information.

My comment indicates that the animal can still die, your comment indicates it doesn't age.

Do you see the meaningless distinction?

No, I meant functionally. As in practically. For all intents and purposes. As in under normal conditions.

It's like if I said "You meant 'searching for' and not 'looking for'", when looking indicates visual searching.

In other words it's a meaningless distinction in the usage and I would look like a real dickhead pedant if I insisted you use another word.

Hey it's my first thought on hearing that Boeing satellite "exploded for no reason".

There is a species of jellyfish which is functionally immortal. When they get too old they simply turn into children again and re-age.

Edit: I'm not saying it's not biologically immortal, I'm saying functionally immortal because I'm indicating that it can still be killed.

Saying something doesn't experience aging is not the same as insisting it cannot die.

2+2=4 is not less correct because 2x2 also equals 4.