Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)NO
Posts
0
Comments
199
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • And who gets to decide that? You? People have different views on the world even between people who don't believe in religion at all. So let's have children be indoctrinated by their schools and surroundings. Just like you view religious views as awful and indoctrinating so do other people view other views the same. You might have a Marxist who loves communism and thinks capitalism and its ideas are awful and that we must fight against the liberal capitalist order. Would you consider that person teaching their children as "indoctrination"?

    Just because you don't have reason to believe in religion doesn't mean other people are in the same boat. And it doesn't mean there isn't logic or reason behind it.

  • You just state that the goal is happiness, well-being, etc. But don't provide an objective argument or evidence for why that's true or an objective moral system. Can you elaborate on that please?

    What if harming others makes me happy? Or I do things that bring me good well being at the cost of others and society?

  • You say that your not making a moral claim but in your original post you say that it can pose psychological or social issues. Which sounds like you're making a moral claim. Unless you're just making a subjective "moral" claim that you don't like people doing X. In which case that's similar to someone saying they don't like soda, candy, or a certain food. Meaning its just preference.

    Thats a decent rule to live by but how do you prove that to be objectively true? How do you show that this moral system is true?

  • Here is a question I'd like to ask. When america still had slaves some slaves broke free and ended up killing some white people. What I find interesting is people don't write them right away and bring into context what they had gone through. Extreme conditions produce extreme actions. And those extreme conditions were made by israel.

  • To die in resistance is better than to live as a slave. The israelis long term plan is to remove the Palestinians anyways by either "relocating" or killing Palestinians. Resistance has to come at some point otherwise its just a matter of time before they cease to exist or be in their land.

  • I assume your atheist? You seem to be making a moral argument that teaching children religion is immoral. I'm wondering how you come to what morally right or wrong? What's your logic or proof for your moral framework?

  • Colin's statements should be taken into consideration. Maxine liking a tweet isn't evidence. We need a investigation that takes context into account and not just one person's claims. I'm not saying she's lying or she's truthful. but rather saying that the proper procedure should be taken. And if involved parties are found to have done what she claims then action should be taken against them

  • Should we believe people just because they claim so? Anyone who makes a claim that something happened to them or someone did X needs to provide evidence. Otherwise anyone can just say anything about anyone.