NoLifeGaming @ NoLifeGaming @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

199

Joined

2 yr. ago

That to me seems like the same logic being used by the israelis to justify killing the Palestinians. Its never justified to go after the civilian population and non combatants.

I think there's a difference between killing Japanese military and Japanese civilians. With that logic the american civilians deserved dying on 9/11

The "pressure" is only as far as to show people he's doing something and politically posture. Real pressure would be to actually do things. Like not send them weapons, sanctions, etc.

Exactly what people said last time, didnt happen.

Japan was definitely a monster that needed to be stopped. But to say that made it okay to drop two nukes instantly killing thousands of civilians is not okay in any case.

Maybe let the aid trucks go in?

Keep digging yourself deeper and just citing some other philosopher as if they're infallible instead of engaging with my arguments. If you have nothing to say of substance then stop wasting my time

Never said I was smarter than them. You must enjoy putting words in people's mouths.

And you bud seem to like to run with the authority fallacy instead of deconstructing my argument and showing it as false. A beacon of intelligence.

I understand it very well but you seem to not understand that there is such a thing as syntactical garbage that means nothing. What you've done is gone and applied "all powerful" to mean the realization of possibilities which cannot exist. It seems like you really wanna push that definition upon people so you can claim God is paradoxical and thus ridiculous. But your position is just as ridiculous as someone saying that an apple can both exist and not exist at the same time.

saying "all powerful" is to say that a being can realize any possibility which can exist. A possibility which cannot exist is like a squared circle. The strawman is that all powerful means to realize even things which cannot exist. In this world there are things which are necessary existence. Meaning they cannot not exist. An example would be the statement "1+1=2" that statement cannot not exist and it is true in all possible worlds. Then you have possible existence such as someone eating an apple. There isn't anything necessary about it and the person could have very well not eaten it or eaten something else. The apple itself isn't a necessary existence. Finally, there is an impossible existence. Which would be something that cannot exist like a squared circle. A God which deletes himself or that can create a rock heavier than himself is an impossible existence as it would contradict the very definition we've given God. Which is the same as saying A and not A. Or that he can both be God and not God. Thus it is syntactical jargon like a squared circle.

A similar one would be can God create a rock so heavy he can't lift it. The problem with these statements is that they're not logically sound. As this would be akin to saying, can god be god and not be god at the same time? Which is contradiction and syntactical jargon. A simpler example is like someone saying they have a squared circle.

AOC has been mostly silent and very "soft" on the matter until recently. Better late than never I guess.

Gotta do something to offset the bad press from genocide

I hope it does for genocide joe

The air drops are mostly political posturing anyways. But its better than nothing.

Sounds interesting! I saw some other guy post about how you guys wouldn't pick pro ukrainian content over pro russian and I think that's the right thing to do. I always found it "interesting" that youtube will always promote the legacy media (in my eyes akin to propaganda) whenever you search for news or current events. Look forward to seeing where this goes and i hope you have an open policy about decisions in the search engine about what you promote vs demote. Who knows what else the other engines are promoting when people search to skew their views.

Why yes of course. Can't have people seeing whats going on in Palestine.

Disgusting. Or we can not support him and set a precedence for the rest of time that a president cannot survive genocide.

It's not a phase, it's based in reality. Take Vietnam and Iraq for example and the civilian casuilities that came out of that. And oh of course we lied about weapons of mass destruction.