Nighed @ Nighed @sffa.community

Posts

10

Comments

451

Joined

2 yr. ago

Na Perez stuck it in the gravel which screwed him up. Red bull is just slow!

Red Bull should set up a charity swear box for Max for tomorrow.

I think he just needs to get out of red bull. They burn out their number 2 drivers.

Eight way is a bit generous, Perez isn't on that level any more

Probably a damaged floor though.

I don't think you can complain too much, he should have had the summer break to practice.

Have any of the tech media done any work on which generations get improvements from this? Zen 4&5 sure, but what about earlier chips?

It's not that I like manuals, it's that I hate automatics randomly shifting and accelerating/slowing down randomly because of it.

It might not be as big an issue in bigger engines cars though, not driven anything bigger than a 1L engine in over a decade.

Looking forward to a direct drive electric car (with customisable acceleration profiles - even better!)

The other known good subs are tied to other teams that either don't want Williams to do better, or may need that driver themselves this season.

This is just a complete lack of trust in Sargent, he is slow and crashes, if they can find someone fast who crashes, or slow but doesn't crash then they have improved things.

In my opinion: about time. Sargent wasn't fast and he crashed almost as much as Maldonado. I guess the car write off on Saturday was the final straw.

Never heard of the new guy though.

Source: https://www.williamsf1.com/posts/fd43d928-0914-42ff-b9ee-394342064dc4/williams-racing-team-statement

If you go into the windows notification centre there is a focus button that handles that for you I think.

There aren't enough AI specialists. More are being created by picking up these projects.

The problem is that AI is too hyped and people are trying to solve things it probably can't solve. The projects I have seen work are basically fancy data ingress/parsing/summarisation apps. That's where the current AI tech can really shine.

If you have the ability to build an AI app in house - holy shit shit that can improve productivity. Copilot itself for office use.... Meh so far.

To actually answer your question - yes, but the only times I actually find it useful is for tests, for everything else it's usually iffy and takes longer.

Intelligently loading the window could be the next useful trick

I think that giving the LLM an API to access additional context and then making it more of an agent style process will give the most improvement.

Let it request the interface for the class your using, let it request the code for that extension method you call. I think that would solve a lot, but I still see a LOT of instances where it calls wrong class/method names randomly.

This would also require a lot more in depth (and language specific!) IDE integration though, so I forsee a lot of price hikes for IDEs in the near future!

I'm going to call BS on that unless they are hiding some new models with huge context windows...

For anything that's not boilerplate, you have to type more as a prompt to the AI than just writing it yourself.

Also, if you have a behaviour/variable that is similar to something common, it will stubbornly refuse to do what you want.

Can PIA catch max?

I thought that sacrificing a Williams would be enough 🤔

That's another Williams chassis....

I mean, my understanding is that they fired half of their story continuity team, resulting in a published (physical) lore book that makes no sense.

So now I don't think they are even trying