Ty for the info. The ZA deal probably makes sense.
Tbh I'm disappointed at how small it's recorded engine power is. Imagining it being able to apply it's city sized power generation to its propeller and hydroplaning away š
From reading through a few, it sounds like while the simulation has improved, it has usability/polish problems (and comparing it to a heavily updated game)
As usual, it sounds like it could have done with another few months of development.
That's an interesting business to be in, it sounds like they just have power plants on boats they can dock where needed to provide power. So if they didn't get paid they could literally sail away with the power plant š¤£
Probably makes sense for infrastructure in some parts of Africa.
In my estate, I own my house, but the road/surroundings are owned by the estate company. However they are covenanted to provide me certain rights/services. In return I must give access for structural repairs etc (and pay estate maintenance fees)
These covenants are linked to the land, so even if they somehow sold it, those rules should (to my understanding) remain for the new owners.
Edit: They can't 100% promise I can get access though as there is a footpath of unknown ownership that crosses the road, so my solicitor forced them to buy me a 100year insurance policy for the value of my house for the unlikely risk of losing that access
I'm doing #[InjectFeeling('good'|'bad')] thanks. Looking forward to #[injectActivity(#Random)] later.
...eh, had to get up early to help with a deployment. Have a meeting with HR to try to get out of the 4 days in office stupidity they are pushing....Meeting up with friends after work though, so not all bad
It depends on the campaign. My players are very against shit going wrong after rolling a 1 in a DAMAGE roll - it penalises classes that have more attack actions.
Pitting as I posted