NewNewAccount @ NewNewAccount @lemmy.world

Posts

12

Comments

746

Joined

2 yr. ago

This is for preserving one’s own library, which makes emulation fully legal instead of the wink wink “legal” that many gamers find themselves in.

“Some of those that burn crosses”

Won’t stop Trumpers from unironically blasting Born in the USA while wearing American flag gear.

Vance’s refusal to say Trump lost the 2020 election last night on national tv, will be highly impactful.

This will have absolutely zero impact.

Well I’m a consumer and I can guarantee you that i can tell when a game is running at 30 vs 60 fps.

Still not buying a Pro though.

Are you suggesting that aid be stopped completely because we can’t guarantee that none of it is being used for military purposes?

You ok?

Many of those Steam Deck, I bet.

Don’t get too excited; he’s left-handed.

Remind me who won in 2016? How do you think all those Bernie supporters felt about the election that was still very much influenced by FPTP dynamics.

It’s not the spread. It’s the likelihood of him winning the state.

Can you elaborate?

Could be a large lake.

So an annual before tax income of $218,750 is considered rich then?

I mean, yeah? Kind of? I’d say it’s at least lower-upper class, which some people may consider rich. But, again, in my head rich is more about net worth, not income. Once someone’s investments are working for them then I’d say that’s a key indicator.

Well the $70,000 average recouped per person in this effort would certainly imply that those targeted are indeed “rich”, or at least high income.

Obviously both can be true, depending on perspective. But being rich is a spectrum.

If you’re a poor studen, the 40 year old who can pay cash for a car but cannot retire still may seem rich but could very well be firmly middle class.

Someone in their 20s who never has to work is more likely to be considered rich by most anyone’s standards. But someone in their 70s who is living modestly in retirement would still meet your second definition but few would consider them actually rich.

I think using net worth is a better measuring stick. In the US someone worth more than $10m is almost certainly living very well off and most would consider them rich.

Does that somehow mean they’re not rich?

Yours, about the economy being fake.

I know you’re (at least partially) joking but wtf are you talking about?

Sorry, sir. Will only present you interesting facts in a serious manner from now on.